» Articles » PMID: 35346783

Joint Modeling of Endpoints Can Be Used to Answer Various Research Questions in Randomized Clinical Trials

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Mar 29
PMID 35346783
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Correlated longitudinal and time-to-event outcomes, such as the rate of cognitive decline and the onset of Alzheimer's disease, are frequent (co-)primary and key secondary endpoints in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Despite their biological associations, these types of data are often analyzed separately, leading to loss of information and increases in bias. In this paper, we set out how joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event endpoints can be used in RCTs to answer various research questions.

Study Design And Setting: The key concepts of joint models are introduced and illustrated for a completed trial in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Results: The output of a joint model can be used to answer different clinically relevant research questions, where the interpretation of effect estimates and those obtained from conventional methods are similar. Albeit joint models have the potential to overcome the limitations of commonly used alternatives, they require additional assumptions regarding the distributions, as well as the associations between two endpoints.

Conclusion: Improving the uptake of joint models in RCTs may start by outlining the exact research question one seeks to answer, thereby determining how best to prespecify the model and defining the parameter that should be of primary interest.

Citing Articles

Predicting progression-free survival from measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Tettamanti F, Kimko H, Sharma S, Di Veroli G Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 17(8):e13905.

PMID: 39164859 PMC: 11335580. DOI: 10.1111/cts.13905.


Association between urea trajectory and protein dose in critically ill adults: a secondary exploratory analysis of the effort protein trial (RE-EFFORT).

Haines R, Prowle J, Day A, Bear D, Heyland D, Puthucheary Z Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):24.

PMID: 38229072 PMC: 10792897. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04799-1.


Exploring flexible polynomial regression as a method to align routine clinical outcomes with daily data capture through remote technologies.

Filipow N, Main E, Tanriver G, Raywood E, Davies G, Douglas H BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023; 23(1):114.

PMID: 37170205 PMC: 10176913. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-01942-4.

References
1.
Asgari S, Khalili D, Zayeri F, Azizi F, Hadaegh F . Dynamic prediction models improved the risk classification of type 2 diabetes compared with classical static models. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 140:33-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.026. View

2.
Cedarbaum J, Stambler N, Malta E, Fuller C, Hilt D, Thurmond B . The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function. BDNF ALS Study Group (Phase III). J Neurol Sci. 1999; 169(1-2):13-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-510x(99)00210-5. View

3.
Schoenfeld D, Richter J . Nomograms for calculating the number of patients needed for a clinical trial with survival as an endpoint. Biometrics. 1982; 38(1):163-70. View

4.
Ibrahim J, Chu H, Chen L . Basic concepts and methods for joint models of longitudinal and survival data. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(16):2796-801. PMC: 4503792. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0654. View

5.
Alsefri M, Sudell M, Garcia-Finana M, Kolamunnage-Dona R . Bayesian joint modelling of longitudinal and time to event data: a methodological review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020; 20(1):94. PMC: 7183597. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-00976-2. View