A Comparison of Healing and Complication Rates Between Common Flaps Utilized in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Review of the Literature

Overview

Journal Knee Surg Relat Res

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2022 Mar 29

PMID 35346398

Authors

Akhil A Chandra

Filippo Romanelli

Alex Tang

Luke Menken

Maximilian Zhang

Adam Feintisch

Frank A Liporace

Richard S Yoon

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Flap reconstruction with perforator, fasciocutaneous, muscular, and/or free microvascular flaps is utilized to cover wound defects and improve vascularization and antibiotic/nutrient delivery. Flap use in revision procedures for total knee arthroplasty has been explored previously; however, current data are limited and studies comparing healing and complication rates between different flap types are lacking.

Methods: A literature review was performed using PubMed on 13 January 2022. Studies were included if they reported healing and complication rates for either gastrocnemius, rectus abdominis, latissimus dorsi, fasciocutaneous, chimeric, or gracilis flaps in the setting of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Results: The final cohort included gastrocnemius (n = 421, healing rate 73.8%, complication rate 59.9%), gracilis (n = 9, healing rate 93%, complication rate 55.6%), latissimus dorsi (n = 41, healing rate 67%, complication rate 46.3%), rectus abdominis (n = 3, healing rate 100%, complication rate 0%), fasciocutaneous (n = 78, healing rate 70%, complication rate 19.2%), and chimeric flaps (n = 4, healing rate 100%, complication rate 25%). There was no significant difference when comparing healing rates across flap types (p = 0.39). There was a significant difference when comparing complication rates across flap types (p < 0.0001), with a significant difference being noted between gastrocnemius and fasciocutaneous complication rates (p < 0.0001). All other comparisons between flap types by complication rate were not significantly different.

Conclusions: Gastrocnemius flaps are the workhorse flap in the setting of revision TKA, as evidenced by this review. Healing rates did not vary significantly across flap types, which suggests that determining the appropriate flap for coverage of soft-tissue defects in revision TKA should be driven by defect size and location as well as physician experience and patient tolerance.

Citing Articles

Complex periprosthetic wound coverage in patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty: a single plastic surgeon study.

Brenneis M, Flevas D, Gayle L, Boettner F, Sculco P, Westrich G Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(12):5093-5100.

PMID: 38662001 PMC: 11602818. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05240-6.

Utilization of the gastrocnemius flap for post-traumatic knee reconstruction: a systematic review.

Gupta R, Weisberger J, Herzog I, Roth J, Lee E Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 34(5):2255-2261.

PMID: 38634884 PMC: 11291595. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-03938-2.

Reconstruction of a lateral thigh defect with a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) free flap: A case report.

Ghavidel M, Akhondinasab M, Karami M, Akbari H, Mortazavi S, Shafaei Y Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023; 112:108842.

PMID: 37856972 PMC: 10667738. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108842.

References

Pozzobon L, Helito C, Guimaraes T, Gobbi R, Pecora J, Camanho G . Rotation flaps for coverage after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Ortop Bras. 2014; 21(4):219-22. PMC: 3862006. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-78522013000400007. View

Han S, Lee K, Mun G . Muscle-chimaeric medial sural artery perforator flap: a new design for complex three-dimensional knee defect. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013; 67(4):571-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.09.023. View

Kim S, Kim K, Hong J, Park S, Park C, Yoon C . Use of the chimeric anterolateral thigh free flap in lower extremity reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2015; 35(8):634-9. DOI: 10.1002/micr.22494. View

Mitsala G, Varey A, ONeill J, Chapman T, Khan U . The distally pedicled gracilis flap for salvage of complex knee wounds. Injury. 2014; 45(11):1776-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.019. View

Meland N, Fisher J, Irons G, Wood M, Cooney W . Experience with 80 rectus abdominis free-tissue transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 83(3):481-7. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198903000-00014. View

Gerwin M, Rothaus K, Windsor R, Brause B, Insall J . Gastrocnemius muscle flap coverage of exposed or infected knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; (286):64-70. View

Bonnin M, Lustig S, Huten D . Extensor tendon ruptures after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016; 102(1 Suppl):S21-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.06.025. View

Chiou H, Chang M, Lo W . One-stage reconstruction of skin defect and patellar tendon rupture after total knee arthroplasty. A new technique. J Arthroplasty. 1997; 12(5):575-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90183-2. View

Browne Jr E, Stulberg B, Sood R . The use of muscle flaps for salvage of failed total knee arthroplasty. Br J Plast Surg. 1994; 47(1):42-5. DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(94)90116-3. View

10.

Hallock G . Chimeric gastrocnemius muscle and sural artery perforator local flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2008; 61(3):306-9. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31815b2792. View

11.

Janis J, Kwon R, Attinger C . The new reconstructive ladder: modifications to the traditional model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127 Suppl 1:205S-212S. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318201271c. View

12.

Siim E, Jakobsen I, MEDGYESI S . Soft-tissue procedures for the exposed knee arthroplasty. 18 cases followed for 7 (1-17) years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991; 62(4):312-4. DOI: 10.3109/17453679108994459. View

13.

Gottlieb L, Krieger L . From the reconstructive ladder to the reconstructive elevator. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994; 93(7):1503-4. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199406000-00027. View

14.

Sano K, Hallock G, Hamazaki M, Daicyo Y . The perforator-based conjoint (chimeric) medial Sural(MEDIAL GASTROCNEMIUS) free flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2004; 53(6):588-92. DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000136971.16368.80. View

15.

Carlesimo B, Marchetti F, Tempesta M, Marcasciano M, Ruggiero M, Scuderi N . Muscular gastrocnemius spacer: a two stage reimplantation technique for infected total knee arthroplasty. Ann Ital Chir. 2013; 84(2):179-85. View

16.

Kuo Y, An P, Kuo M, Kueh N, Yao S, Jeng S . Reconstruction of knee joint soft tissue and patellar tendon defects using a composite anterolateral thigh flap with vascularized fascia lata. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008; 61(2):195-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.06.012. View

17.

Papp A, Kettunen J, Miettinen H . Pedicled gastrocnemius flap in complicated total knee arthroplasty. Scand J Surg. 2003; 92(2):156-9. DOI: 10.1177/145749690309200208. View

18.

Menderes A, Demirdover C, Yilmaz M, Vayvada H, Barutcu A . Reconstruction of soft tissue defects following total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2002; 9(3):215-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0160(02)00010-8. View

19.

Anract P, Missenard G, Jeanrot C, Dubois V, Tomeno B . Knee reconstruction with prosthesis and muscle flap after total arthrectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (384):208-16. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200103000-00024. View

20.

Nahabedian M, ORLANDO J, Delanois R, Mont M, Hungerford D . Salvage procedures for complex soft tissue defects of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (356):119-24. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00017. View