» Articles » PMID: 35346023

Investigating the Interaction Between Inter-locus and Intra-locus Sexual Conflict Using Hemiclonal Analysis in Drosophila Melanogaster

Overview
Journal BMC Ecol Evol
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Mar 29
PMID 35346023
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Divergence in the evolutionary interests of males and females leads to sexual conflict. Traditionally, sexual conflict has been classified into two types: inter-locus sexual conflict (IeSC) and intra-locus sexual conflict (IaSC). IeSC is modeled as a conflict over outcomes of intersexual reproductive interactions mediated by loci that are sex-limited in their effects. IaSC is thought to be a product of selection acting in opposite directions in males and females on traits with a common underlying genetic basis. While in their canonical formalisms IaSC and IeSC are mutually exclusive, there is growing support for the idea that the two may interact. Empirical evidence for such interactions, however, is limited.

Results: Here, we investigated the interaction between IeSC and IaSC in Drosophila melanogaster. Using hemiclonal analysis, we sampled 39 hemigenomes from a laboratory-adapted population of D. melanogaster. We measured the contribution of each hemigenome to adult male and female fitness at three different intensities of IeSC, obtained by varying the operational sex ratio. Subsequently, we estimated the intensity of IaSC at each sex ratio by calculating the intersexual genetic correlation (r) for fitness and the proportion of sexually antagonistic fitness-variation. We found that the intersexual genetic correlation for fitness was positive at all three sex ratios. Additionally, at male biased and equal sex ratios the r was higher, and the proportion of sexually antagonistic fitness variation lower, relative to the female biased sex ratio, although this trend was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Our results indicate a statistically non-significant trend suggesting that increasing the strength of IeSC ameliorates IaSC in the population.

Citing Articles

A shared developmental genetic basis for sexually antagonistic male and female adaptations in the toothed water strider.

Pruvot C, Armisen D, Roux P, Arnqvist G, Rowe L, Husby A Evol Lett. 2025; 9(1):13-23.

PMID: 39906577 PMC: 11790218. DOI: 10.1093/evlett/qrae056.

References
1.
Long T, Agrawal A, Rowe L . The effect of sexual selection on offspring fitness depends on the nature of genetic variation. Curr Biol. 2012; 22(3):204-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.020. View

2.
Sharp N, Vincent C . The effect of parasites on sex differences in selection. Heredity (Edinb). 2015; 114(4):367-72. PMC: 4359975. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2014.110. View

3.
Filice D, Long T . Genetic variation in male-induced harm in Drosophila melanogaster. Biol Lett. 2016; 12(4). PMC: 4881355. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0105. View

4.
Lankinen A, Hydbom S, Strandh M . Sexually antagonistic evolution caused by male-male competition in the pistil. Evolution. 2017; 71(10):2359-2369. DOI: 10.1111/evo.13329. View

5.
Tilszer M, Antoszczyk K, Salek N, Zajac E, Radwan J . Evolution under relaxed sexual conflict in the bulb mite Rhizoglyphus robini. Evolution. 2006; 60(9):1868-73. DOI: 10.1554/06-060.1. View