» Articles » PMID: 35344601

The Influence of Reinforcement Schedule on Experience-dependent Changes in Motivation

Overview
Date 2022 Mar 28
PMID 35344601
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The progressive ratio procedure is used across fields to assess motivation for different reinforcers, define the effects of experimental interventions on motivation, and determine experience-dependent changes in motivation. However, less is known about how operant training schedules affect performance on this widely utilized task. Here we designed an experiment to examine the effect of variable ratio versus fixed ratio training schedules of reinforcement on progressive ratio performance while holding other performance variables constant between groups. We found a robust increase in maximum ratio completed between the pretest and posttraining test highlighting a robust training effect on progressive ratio performance. However, it did not matter if the training was under a fixed or variable ratio schedule. Additionally, we show that neither individual rates during training nor extinction responding correlated with maximum ratio achieved during the sessions. Finally, we show that rates during the training sessions do correlate with extinction performance, suggesting that these variables measure a different aspect of performance that does not predict motivation.

Citing Articles

Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Release From a Unique Subpopulation of Accumbal Neurons Constrains Action-Outcome Acquisition in Reward Learning.

Eckenwiler E, Ingebretson A, Stolley J, Fusaro M, Romportl A, Ross J Biol Psychiatry. 2024; 97(6):637-650.

PMID: 39181385 PMC: 11839403. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.08.006.


Food Restriction Level and Reinforcement Schedule Differentially Influence Behavior during Acquisition and Devaluation Procedures in Mice.

Chevee M, Kim C, Crow N, Follman E, Leonard M, Calipari E eNeuro. 2023; 10(9).

PMID: 37696663 PMC: 10537440. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0063-23.2023.


Measuring Motivation Using the Progressive Ratio Task in Adolescent Mice.

Cambre E, Christenfeld E, Torres A, Canetta S Curr Protoc. 2023; 3(5):e776.

PMID: 37191459 PMC: 10321213. DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.776.


Intense long-term training impairs brain health compared with moderate exercise: Experimental evidence and mechanisms.

Sanguesa G, Batlle M, Munoz-Moreno E, Soria G, Alcarraz A, Rubies C Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2022; 1518(1):282-298.

PMID: 36256544 PMC: 10092505. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14912.

References
1.
Cunningham C, Fidler T, Hill K . Animal models of alcohol's motivational effects. Alcohol Res Health. 2001; 24(2):85-92. PMC: 6713011. View

2.
Allain F, Samaha A . Revisiting long-access versus short-access cocaine self-administration in rats: intermittent intake promotes addiction symptoms independent of session length. Addict Biol. 2018; 24(4):641-651. DOI: 10.1111/adb.12629. View

3.
Ostlund S, Kosheleff A, Maidment N . Relative response cost determines the sensitivity of instrumental reward seeking to dopamine receptor blockade. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012; 37(12):2653-60. PMC: 3473331. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2012.129. View

4.
Rotolo R, Dragacevic V, Kalaba P, Urban E, Zehl M, Roller A . The Novel Atypical Dopamine Uptake Inhibitor -CE-123 Partially Reverses the Effort-Related Effects of the Dopamine Depleting Agent Tetrabenazine and Increases Progressive Ratio Responding. Front Pharmacol. 2019; 10:682. PMC: 6611521. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00682. View

5.
Roberts D, Loh E, Vickers G . Self-administration of cocaine on a progressive ratio schedule in rats: dose-response relationship and effect of haloperidol pretreatment. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989; 97(4):535-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00439560. View