» Articles » PMID: 35344197

Management of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in Older and Frail Patients: Have Novel Treatment Approaches Improved Their Care?

Overview
Journal Drugs Aging
Specialties Geriatrics
Pharmacology
Date 2022 Mar 28
PMID 35344197
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Patients with urothelial carcinoma tend to be older and frailer with a large number of chronic medical conditions. This is particularly pronounced in those with unresectable locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Prior to 2016, treatment options in advanced urothelial carcinoma were limited to chemotherapy, and as a result, a large number of patients were not receiving disease-directed management. Over the last 6 years, multiple alternative modalities including immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies have been introduced. They are being utilized clinically in older and frail patients, but there are limited studies investigating outcomes in these specific populations. Based upon current evidence, age does not impact the efficacy and tolerance of immune checkpoint inhibitors if patients are fit enough to receive therapy. In frailer patients, immune checkpoint inhibitors appear to be safe, but outcomes from largely retrospective studies demonstrate mixed data regarding their efficacy. Although there are indications from clinical trials that enfortumab vedotin, sacituzumab govitecan, and erdafitinib are also efficacious irrespective of age, there is still not enough evidence to draw definitive conclusions about their use in older and frail patients. Regardless, in all older patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, it is critical to evaluate for frailty through geriatric screening tools and comprehensive assessments. Combining these evaluations with consideration of an individual patient's goals should be the foundation upon which therapeutic decisions are made in this population of patients.

Citing Articles

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes by Age in Metastatic Urinary Tract Cancer: A Retrospective Tertiary Cancer Center Analysis.

Tripathi N, Gebrael G, Chigarira B, Sahu K, Balasubramanian I, Caparas C Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38893262 PMC: 11172373. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112143.


Progress in systemic therapy for advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma.

Nadal R, Valderrama B, Bellmunt J Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023; 21(1):8-27.

PMID: 37945764 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00826-2.


Navigating the Rapidly Evolving Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treatment Landscape: Insights from Italian Experts.

Santini D, Banna G, Buti S, Isella L, Stellato M, Roberto M Curr Oncol Rep. 2023; 25(11):1345-1362.

PMID: 37855848 PMC: 10640402. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01461-x.

References
1.
Sloan F, Yashkin A, Akushevich I, Inman B . The Cost to Medicare of Bladder Cancer Care. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019; 3(4):515-522. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.01.015. View

2.
Garg T, Young A, Kost K, Danella J, Larson S, Nielsen M . Burden of Multiple Chronic Conditions among Patients with Urological Cancer. J Urol. 2017; 199(2):543-550. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.005. View

3.
Fisher M, Shenolikar R, Miller P, Fenton M, Walker M . Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Stage IV Bladder Cancer in a Community Oncology Setting: 2008-2015. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018; 16(6):e1171-e1179. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.07.025. View

4.
Hutchins L, Unger J, Crowley J, COLTMAN Jr C, Albain K . Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(27):2061-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199912303412706. View

5.
BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Krok-Schoen J, Canin B, Parker I, MacKenzie A, Koll T . The underreporting of phase III chemo-therapeutic clinical trial data of older patients with cancer: A systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol. 2020; 11(3):369-379. PMC: 7412117. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.12.007. View