» Articles » PMID: 35342869

Validity and Reliability Analysis of the PlotDigitizer Software Program for Data Extraction from Single-Case Graphs

Overview
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2022 Mar 28
PMID 35342869
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Access to raw data of graphs presented in original articles to calculate the effect size of single-case research is a challenge for researchers conducting studies such as meta-analysis. Researchers typically use data extraction software programs to extract raw data from the graphs in articles. In this study, we aimed to analyze the validity and reliability of the PlotDigitizer software program, which is widely used in literature and an alternative to other data extraction programs, on computers with different operating systems. We performed the digitization of 6.846 data points on three different computers using 15 hypothetical graphs with 20 data series and 186 graphs with 242 data series from 29 published articles to accomplish the goal. Besides, using the values we digitized, we recalculated the 23 effect sizes presented in the original articles for validity analysis. Based on our sampling, we calculated intercoder and intracoder Pearson correlation coefficients. The results showed that PlotDigitizer could be an alternative to other programs as it is free and can run on many current and outdated systems, and it is valid and reliable as it is nearly perfect. Based on the obtained results and considering the data extraction process, we presented various recommendations for the researchers that will use the PlotDigitizer program for the quantitative analysis of single-case graphs.

Citing Articles

Associations of the gut, cervical, and vaginal microbiota with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wen Q, Wang S, Min Y, Liu X, Fang J, Lang J BMC Womens Health. 2025; 25(1):65.

PMID: 39955550 PMC: 11829412. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-025-03599-1.


Sex Differences in Grip Strength From Birth to Age 16: A Meta-Analysis.

Nuzzo J Eur J Sport Sci. 2025; 25(3):e12268.

PMID: 39954272 PMC: 11829709. DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12268.


Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on renal function in adults with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Peng H, Hu C, Wu Y, Liu W, Tsai C, Kuan Y Sleep Breath. 2025; 29(1):102.

PMID: 39945962 DOI: 10.1007/s11325-025-03256-9.


Quercetin as a therapeutic agent for skin problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis on antioxidant effects, oxidative stress, inflammation, wound healing, hyperpigmentation, aging, and skin cancer.

Okselni T, Septama A, Juliadmi D, Dewi R, Angelina M, Yuliani T Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024; .

PMID: 39738831 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-024-03722-3.


Effects of Valproic Acid Embryonic Exposure on Zebrafish: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Flores-Prieto B, Manzo-Denes J, Hernandez-Aguilar M, Coria-Avila G, Herrera-Covarrubias D, Aranda-Abreu G NeuroSci. 2024; 5(4):650-665.

PMID: 39728678 PMC: 11678182. DOI: 10.3390/neurosci5040046.


References
1.
Moeyaert M, Maggin D, Verkuilen J . Reliability, Validity, and Usability of Data Extraction Programs for Single-Case Research Designs. Behav Modif. 2016; 40(6):874-900. DOI: 10.1177/0145445516645763. View

2.
Smith J . Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychol Methods. 2012; 17(4):510-50. PMC: 3652808. DOI: 10.1037/a0029312. View

3.
Shadish W, Sullivan K . Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008. Behav Res Methods. 2011; 43(4):971-80. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0111-y. View

4.
Zimmerman K, Pustejovsky J, Ledford J, Barton E, Severini K, Lloyd B . Single-case synthesis tools II: Comparing quantitative outcome measures. Res Dev Disabil. 2018; 79:65-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.001. View

5.
Parker R, Vannest K, Davis J, Sauber S . Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behav Ther. 2011; 42(2):284-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006. View