Biomechanical Analysis of Coracoid Stability After Coracoplasty: How Low Can You Go?

Overview

Journal Orthop J Sports Med

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2022 Mar 28

PMID 35340899

Authors

Lukas F Heilmann

Julia Sussiek

Michael J Raschke

Martin F Langer

Andre Frank

Jens Wermers

Philipp A Michel

Felix Dyrna

Benedikt Schliemann

J Christoph Katthagen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Arthroscopic coracoplasty is a procedure for patients affected by subcoracoid impingement. To date, there is no consensus on how much of the coracoid can be resected with an arthroscopic burr without compromising its stability.

Purpose: To determine the maximum amount of the coracoid that can be resected during arthroscopic coracoplasty without leading to coracoid fracture or avulsion of the conjoint tendon during simulated activities of daily living (ADLs).

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: A biomechanical cadaveric study was performed with 24 shoulders (15 male, 9 female; mean age, 81 ± 7.9 years). Specimens were randomized into 3 treatment groups: group A (native coracoid), group B (3-mm coracoplasty), and group C (5-mm coracoplasty). Coracoid anatomic measurements were documented before and after coracoplasty. The scapula was potted, and a traction force was applied through the conjoint tendon. The stiffness and load to failure (LTF) were determined for each specimen.

Results: The mean coracoid thicknesses in groups A through C were 7.2, 7.7, and 7.8 mm, respectively, and the mean LTFs were 428 ± 127, 284 ± 77, and 159 ± 87 N, respectively. Compared with specimens in group A, a significantly lower LTF was seen in specimens in group B ( = .022) and group C ( < .001). Postoperatively, coracoids with a thickness ≥4 mm were able to withstand ADLs.

Conclusion: While even a 3-mm coracoplasty caused significant weakening of the coracoid, the individual failure loads were higher than those of the predicted ADLs. A critical value of 4 mm of coracoid thickness should be preserved to ensure the stability of the coracoid process.

Clinical Relevance: In correspondence with the findings of this study, careful preoperative planning should be used to measure the maximum reasonable amount of coracoplasty to be performed. A postoperative coracoid thickness of 4 mm should remain.

References

Hughes P, Green R, Taylor N . Measurement of subacromial impingement of the rotator cuff. J Sci Med Sport. 2011; 15(1):2-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.07.001. View

Gerber C, Terrier F, Ganz R . The role of the coracoid process in the chronic impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985; 67(5):703-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.67B5.4055864. View

Lo I, Burkhart S . The etiology and assessment of subscapularis tendon tears: a case for subcoracoid impingement, the roller-wringer effect, and TUFF lesions of the subscapularis. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19(10):1142-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.024. View

Boutsiadis A, Bampis I, Swan J, Barth J . Best implant choice for coracoid graft fixation during the Latarjet procedure depends on patients' morphometric considerations. J Exp Orthop. 2020; 7(1):15. PMC: 7078396. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-020-00230-0. View

Arrigoni P, Brady P, Burkhart S . Calcific tendonitis of the subscapularis tendon causing subcoracoid stenosis and coracoid impingement. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22(10):1139.e1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.06.028. View

Brunkhorst J, Giphart J, LaPrade R, Millett P . Coracohumeral Distances and Correlation to Arm Rotation: An In Vivo 3-Dimensional Biplane Fluoroscopy Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015; 1(2):2325967113496059. PMC: 4555485. DOI: 10.1177/2325967113496059. View

Tollemar V, Wang J, Koh J, Lee M, Shi L . Coracoid morphology is not associated with subscapularis tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29(6):1162-1167. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.11.008. View

Bhatia D, de Beer J, du Toit D . Coracoid process anatomy: implications in radiographic imaging and surgery. Clin Anat. 2007; 20(7):774-84. DOI: 10.1002/ca.20525. View

Martetschlager F, Saier T, Weigert A, Herbst E, Winkler M, Henschel J . Effect of Coracoid Drilling for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction Techniques on Coracoid Fracture Risk: A Biomechanical Study. Arthroscopy. 2016; 32(6):982-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.049. View

10.

Dines D, Warren R, INGLIS A, Pavlov H . The coracoid impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72(2):314-6. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B2.2312576. View

11.

Katthagen J, Vap A, Tahal D, Horan M, Millett P . Arthroscopic Repair of Isolated Partial- and Full-Thickness Upper Third Subscapularis Tendon Tears: Minimum 2-Year Outcomes After Single-Anchor Repair and Biceps Tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2017; 33(7):1286-1293. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.027. View

12.

Ferreira J, Chowaniec D, Obopilwe E, Nowak M, Arciero R, Mazzocca A . Biomechanical evaluation of effect of coracoid tunnel placement on load to failure of fixation during repair of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy. 2012; 28(9):1230-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.004. View

13.

Kim S, Choi Y, Jung M, Yoon Y, Chun Y . Concomitant coracoplasty during arthroscopic subscapularis repair does not yield better clinical outcomes and structural integrity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 26(1):56-62. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4368-7. View

14.

Mohammed H, Skalski M, Patel D, Tomasian A, Schein A, White E . Coracoid Process: The Lighthouse of the Shoulder. Radiographics. 2016; 36(7):2084-2101. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016160039. View

15.

Martetschlager F, Horan M, Warth R, Millett P . Complications after anatomic fixation and reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(12):2896-903. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513502459. View

16.

Krappinger D, Roth T, Gschwentner M, Suckert A, Blauth M, Hengg C . Preoperative assessment of the cancellous bone mineral density of the proximal humerus using CT data. Skeletal Radiol. 2011; 41(3):299-304. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1174-7. View

17.

MacMahon P, Taylor D, Duke D, Brennan D, OBrien J, Eustace S . Contribution of full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears to acquired subcoracoid impingement. Clin Radiol. 2007; 62(6):556-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.01.004. View

18.

Millett P, Fritz E, Frangiamore S, Mannava S . Arthroscopic Management of Glenohumeral Arthritis: A Joint Preservation Approach. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018; 26(21):745-752. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00214. View

19.

Cunningham G, Ladermann A . Redefining anterior shoulder impingement: a literature review. Int Orthop. 2017; 42(2):359-366. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3515-1. View

20.

Hatta T, Yamamoto N, Sano H, Omori Y, Sugamoto K, Suzuki K . Three-Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of the Coracohumeral Distance Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2017; 9(1):6999. PMC: 5391515. DOI: 10.4081/or.2017.6999. View