» Articles » PMID: 35340455

Recent Technical Developments in the Field of Laparoscopic Surgery: A Literature Review

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2022 Mar 28
PMID 35340455
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The benefits of laparoscopic surgery (LS) include a speedy recovery, shorter duration of hospital stay, minimal postoperative pain, discomfort and disabilities, and better cosmetic outcomes (less scarring) that help an individual to resume normal daily activities and return to work. A comprehensive literature search on laparoscopic surgeries was conducted using different Internet-based search engines and databases from August 2021 to October 2021. The search was limited to articles published in the English language and those published between years 2005 and 2021. A total of 126 articles were initially identified. Two independent reviewers thoroughly examined the quality and content of the articles. Articles with duplicate data were excluded, and the remaining articles were screened and assessed by the titles and abstracts. After a vigorous assessment, we included data from 49 articles for this review process. Bibliographic management was done using the software "EndNote" (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY, USA). It was concluded that LS has become the technique of choice for virtually every kind of abdominal surgery, evident by numerous scholarly publications in this field. Level I evidence demonstrating the advantage of LS over open surgery has been reported for numerous operations, including fundoplication for gastroesophageal regurgitation disease, bariatric surgery for weight loss, and cancer resection. Advanced LS has subsequently been expanded to include hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, urology, and gynecology. Patients who are at risk of having elevated abdominal pressure during LS, however, should proceed with care. Recent advances in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery are promising.

Citing Articles

Nurse-led discharge versus consulting surgeon-led discharge for patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeries: an evaluation of follow-up outcome, readmission frequencies, cost of care, and satisfaction of patients.

Yang B, Luo X, Wang P, Pan P, Lin P, Zhao W BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):218.

PMID: 40011912 PMC: 11863688. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-02805-7.


Initial Outcomes and Methodologies of a Novel Single-Port Robotic Surgery in Gynecology.

Gong P, Mao H, He T, Bai L, Wang H, Zhao J JSLS. 2025; 28(4.

PMID: 39831275 PMC: 11741202. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00047.


Comparison of Mortality and Postoperative Complications Between Open and Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: An Umbrella Review.

Eghbali F, Banijamali M, Jahanshahi F, TizMaghz A, Rezvani H, Ghadimi P Minim Invasive Surg. 2024; 2024:5521798.

PMID: 39552835 PMC: 11568887. DOI: 10.1155/2024/5521798.


Erector spinae plane block for laparoscopic surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Oraee S, Rajai Firouzabadi S, Mohammadi I, Alinejadfard M, Golsorkh H, Hatami S BMC Anesthesiol. 2024; 24(1):389.

PMID: 39472781 PMC: 11520691. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02775-4.


Predicting Postoperative Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: A Machine Learning Approach Using SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica) CoDIG Data.

Anania G, Chiozza M, Pedarzani E, Resta G, Campagnaro A, Pedon S Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(16).

PMID: 39199628 PMC: 11352329. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16162857.


References
1.
Forgione A, Guraya S . The cutting-edge training modalities and educational platforms for accredited surgical training: A systematic review. J Res Med Sci. 2017; 22:51. PMC: 5426099. DOI: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_809_16. View

2.
Furbetta N, Cervelli R, Furbetta F . Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, the past, the present and the future. Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(Suppl 1):S4. PMC: 7154322. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.17. View

3.
Choi K, Kim M, Park H, Choi D, Choi S, Heo J . Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic splenectomy: a retrospective comparison of outcomes. Surg Innov. 2012; 20(1):40-5. DOI: 10.1177/1553350612443898. View

4.
Lee S, Choi Y, Kim B, Cha S, Park J, Chang I . Single port laparoscopic appendectomy in children using glove port and conventional rigid instruments. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014; 86(1):35-8. PMC: 3994610. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2014.86.1.35. View

5.
Wang W, Huang M, Wei P, Lee W . Laparoscopic antireflux surgery for the elderly: a surgical and quality-of-life study. Surg Today. 2008; 38(4):305-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-007-3619-0. View