» Articles » PMID: 35336456

Data Fusion in Agriculture: Resolving Ambiguities and Closing Data Gaps

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Mar 26
PMID 35336456
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acquiring useful data from agricultural areas has always been somewhat of a challenge, as these are often expansive, remote, and vulnerable to weather events. Despite these challenges, as technologies evolve and prices drop, a surge of new data are being collected. Although a wealth of data are being collected at different scales (i.e., proximal, aerial, satellite, ancillary data), this has been geographically unequal, causing certain areas to be virtually devoid of useful data to help face their specific challenges. However, even in areas with available resources and good infrastructure, data and knowledge gaps are still prevalent, because agricultural environments are mostly uncontrolled and there are vast numbers of factors that need to be taken into account and properly measured for a full characterization of a given area. As a result, data from a single sensor type are frequently unable to provide unambiguous answers, even with very effective algorithms, and even if the problem at hand is well defined and limited in scope. Fusing the information contained in different sensors and in data from different types is one possible solution that has been explored for some decades. The idea behind data fusion involves exploring complementarities and synergies of different kinds of data in order to extract more reliable and useful information about the areas being analyzed. While some success has been achieved, there are still many challenges that prevent a more widespread adoption of this type of approach. This is particularly true for the highly complex environments found in agricultural areas. In this article, we provide a comprehensive overview on the data fusion applied to agricultural problems; we present the main successes, highlight the main challenges that remain, and suggest possible directions for future research.

Citing Articles

Experimenting Agriculture 4.0 with Sensors: A Data Fusion Approach between Remote Sensing, UAVs and Self-Driving Tractors.

Barrile V, Simonetti S, Citroni R, Fotia A, Bilotta G Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(20).

PMID: 36298261 PMC: 9611850. DOI: 10.3390/s22207910.

References
1.
Cruz A, Luvisi A, De Bellis L, Ampatzidis Y . X-FIDO: An Effective Application for Detecting Olive Quick Decline Syndrome with Deep Learning and Data Fusion. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8:1741. PMC: 5641424. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01741. View

2.
Zhou T, Pan J, Zhang P, Wei S, Han T . Mapping Winter Wheat with Multi-Temporal SAR and Optical Images in an Urban Agricultural Region. Sensors (Basel). 2017; 17(6). PMC: 5492115. DOI: 10.3390/s17061210. View

3.
Wilkinson M, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg I, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A . The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016; 3:160018. PMC: 4792175. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. View

4.
Anastasiou E, Castrignano A, Arvanitis K, Fountas S . A multi-source data fusion approach to assess spatial-temporal variability and delineate homogeneous zones: A use case in a table grape vineyard in Greece. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 684:155-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.324. View

5.
Zhao Y, Gong L, Huang Y, Liu C . Robust Tomato Recognition for Robotic Harvesting Using Feature Images Fusion. Sensors (Basel). 2016; 16(2):173. PMC: 4801551. DOI: 10.3390/s16020173. View