» Articles » PMID: 35335576

Assessment of the Influence of Size and Concentration on the Ecotoxicity of Microplastics to Microalgae Sp., Bacterium and Yeast

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Mar 26
PMID 35335576
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The harmful effects of microplastics are not yet fully revealed. This study tested harmful effects of polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) microplastics were tested. Growth inhibition tests were conducted using three microorganisms with different characteristics: sp., , and . The growth inhibition test with sp. is relatively widely used, while the tests with and were, to our knowledge, applied to microplastics for the first time. The influence of concentration and size of microplastic particles, in the range of 50-1000 mg/L and 200-600 µm, was tested. Determined inhibitions on all three microorganisms confirmed the hazardous potential of the microplastics used. Modeling of the inhibition surface showed the increase in harmfulness with increasing concentration of the microplastics. Particle size showed no effect for with PE, PP and PET, with PS, and with PP. In the remaining cases, higher inhibitions followed a decrease in particle size. The exception was sp. with PS, where the lowest inhibitions were obtained at 400 µm. Finally, among the applied tests, the test with proved to be the most sensitive to microplastics.

Citing Articles

Zooming in the plastisphere: the ecological interface for phytoplankton-plastic interactions in aquatic ecosystems.

Nava V, Dar J, De Santis V, Fehlinger L, Pasqualini J, Adekolurejo O Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024; 100(2):834-854.

PMID: 39542439 PMC: 11885710. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13164.


Biodegradable Polyesters and Low Molecular Weight Polyethylene in Soil: Interrelations of Material Properties, Soil Organic Matter Substances, and Microbial Community.

Sera J, Huynh F, Ly F, Vinter S, Kadleckova M, Kratka V Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(24).

PMID: 36555615 PMC: 9788293. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232415976.

References
1.
Yin L, Wen X, Huang D, Zeng G, Deng R, Liu R . Microplastics retention by reeds in freshwater environment. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 790:148200. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148200. View

2.
Lei L, Wu S, Lu S, Liu M, Song Y, Fu Z . Microplastic particles cause intestinal damage and other adverse effects in zebrafish Danio rerio and nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci Total Environ. 2017; 619-620:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.103. View

3.
Canniff P, Hoang T . Microplastic ingestion by Daphnia magna and its enhancement on algal growth. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 633:500-507. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.176. View

4.
Esiukova E, Lobchuk O, Volodina A, Chubarenko I . Marine macrophytes retain microplastics. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021; 171:112738. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112738. View

5.
Kumar R, Pandit P, Kumar D, Patel Z, Pandya L, Kumar M . Landfill microbiome harbour plastic degrading genes: A metagenomic study of solid waste dumping site of Gujarat, India. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 779:146184. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146184. View