» Articles » PMID: 35332311

Should Mutant TP53 Be Targeted for Cancer Therapy?

Overview
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2022 Mar 25
PMID 35332311
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mutations in the TP53 tumour suppressor gene are found in ~50% of human cancers [1-6]. TP53 functions as a transcription factor that directly regulates the expression of ~500 genes, some of them involved in cell cycle arrest/cell senescence, apoptotic cell death or DNA damage repair, i.e. the cellular responses that together prevent tumorigenesis [1-6]. Defects in TP53 function not only cause tumour development but also impair the response of malignant cells to anti-cancer drugs, particularly those that induce DNA damage [1-6]. Most mutations in TP53 in human cancers cause a single amino acid substitution, usually within the DNA binding domain of the TP53 protein. These mutant TP53 proteins are often expressed at high levels in the malignant cells. Three cancer causing attributes have been postulated for mutant TP53 proteins: the inability to activate target genes controlled by wt TP53 (loss-of-function, LOF) that are critical for tumour suppression, dominant negative effects (DNE), i.e. blocking the function of wt TP53 in cells during early stages of transformation when mutant and wt TP53 proteins are co-expressed, and gain-of-function (GOF) effects whereby mutant TP53 impacts diverse cellular pathways by interacting with proteins that are not normally engaged by wt TP53 [1-6]. The GOF effects of mutant TP53 were reported to be essential for the sustained proliferation and survival of malignant cells and it was therefore proposed that agents that can remove mutant TP53 protein would have substantial therapeutic impact [7-9]. In this review article we discuss evidence for and against the value of targeting mutant TP53 protein for cancer therapy.

Citing Articles

The Common Hallmarks and Interconnected Pathways of Aging, Circadian Rhythms, and Cancer: Implications for Therapeutic Strategies.

Wang J, Shao F, Yu Q, Ye L, Wusiman D, Wu R Research (Wash D C). 2025; 8:0612.

PMID: 40046513 PMC: 11880593. DOI: 10.34133/research.0612.


Impact of UV-Irradiated Mesoporous Titania Nanoparticles (mTiNPs) on Key Onco- and Tumor Suppressor microRNAs of PC3 Prostate Cancer Cells.

Mendez-Garcia A, Bravo-Vazquez L, Sahare P, Paul S Genes (Basel). 2025; 16(2).

PMID: 40004477 PMC: 11855573. DOI: 10.3390/genes16020148.


Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prognosis and Immunotherapy Response Using Mitochondrial Dysregulation Features.

Yu J, Wu S, Gong J, Deng W, Xiao Z, Wu L J Cell Mol Med. 2025; 29(3):e70389.

PMID: 39910622 PMC: 11798730. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.70389.


Small molecules that targeting p53 Y220C protein: mechanisms, structures, and clinical advances in anti-tumor therapy.

Xu J, Yuan J, Wang W, Zhu X, Li J, Ma Y Mol Divers. 2025; .

PMID: 39799258 DOI: 10.1007/s11030-024-11045-x.


TP53 mutations and MDM2 polymorphisms in breast and ovarian cancers: amelioration by drugs and natural compounds.

Chakraborty R, Dutta A, Mukhopadhyay R Clin Transl Oncol. 2025; .

PMID: 39797946 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03841-6.


References
1.
Kastenhuber E, Lowe S . Putting p53 in Context. Cell. 2017; 170(6):1062-1078. PMC: 5743327. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.028. View

2.
Vousden K, Lane D . p53 in health and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007; 8(4):275-83. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2147. View

3.
Vousden K, Prives C . Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53. Cell. 2009; 137(3):413-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.037. View

4.
Levine A . p53: 800 million years of evolution and 40 years of discovery. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020; 20(8):471-480. DOI: 10.1038/s41568-020-0262-1. View

5.
Oren M . p53: not just a tumor suppressor. J Mol Cell Biol. 2019; 11(7):539-543. PMC: 6736137. DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjz070. View