» Articles » PMID: 35330380

Exoskeletons for Mobility After Spinal Cord Injury: A Personalized Embodied Approach

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2022 Mar 25
PMID 35330380
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Endowed with inherent flexibility, wearable robotic technologies are powerful devices that are known to extend bodily functionality to assist people with spinal cord injuries (SCIs). However, rather than considering the specific psychological and other physiological needs of their users, these devices are specifically designed to compensate for motor impairment. This could partially explain why they still cannot be adopted as an everyday solution, as only a small number of patients use lower-limb exoskeletons. It remains uncertain how these devices can be appropriately embedded in mental representations of the body. From this perspective, we aimed to highlight the homeostatic role of autonomic and interoceptive signals and their possible integration in a personalized experience of exoskeleton overground walking. To ensure personalized user-centered robotic technologies, optimal robotic devices should be designed and adjusted according to the patient's condition. We discuss how embodied approaches could emerge as a means of overcoming the hesitancy toward wearable robots.

Citing Articles

Neurotrauma-From Injury to Repair: Clinical Perspectives, Cellular Mechanisms and Promoting Regeneration of the Injured Brain and Spinal Cord.

Stevens A, Belli A, Ahmed Z Biomedicines. 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38540256 PMC: 10968440. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12030643.


Shaping high-performance wearable robots for human motor and sensory reconstruction and enhancement.

Xia H, Zhang Y, Rajabi N, Taleb F, Yang Q, Kragic D Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):1760.

PMID: 38409128 PMC: 10897332. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46249-0.


From Brain Models to Robotic Embodied Cognition: How Does Biological Plausibility Inform Neuromorphic Systems?.

Pham M, DAngiulli A, Dehnavi M, Chhabra R Brain Sci. 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37759917 PMC: 10526461. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13091316.


Design and Validation of a Low-Level Controller for Hierarchically Controlled Exoskeletons.

Herron C, Fuge Z, Kogelis M, Tremaroli N, Kalita B, Leonessa A Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(2).

PMID: 36679811 PMC: 9866104. DOI: 10.3390/s23021014.


Integrated Neuroregenerative Techniques for Plasticity of the Injured Spinal Cord.

Leemhuis E, Favieri F, Forte G, Pazzaglia M Biomedicines. 2022; 10(10).

PMID: 36289825 PMC: 9599452. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102563.


References
1.
Maravita A, Spence C, Kennett S, Driver J . Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition. 2002; 83(2):B25-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00003-3. View

2.
Pfeifer R, Lungarella M, Iida F . Self-organization, embodiment, and biologically inspired robotics. Science. 2007; 318(5853):1088-93. DOI: 10.1126/science.1145803. View

3.
Ashe M, Craven C, Eng J, Krassioukov A . Prevention and Treatment of Bone Loss after a Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2012; 13(1):123-145. PMC: 3389041. DOI: 10.1310/sci1301-123. View

4.
Pazzaglia M, Galli G, Scivoletto G, Molinari M . A functionally relevant tool for the body following spinal cord injury. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e58312. PMC: 3590178. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058312. View

5.
Stern E, Grimaldi S, Muratore A, Murrough J, Leibu E, Fleysher L . Neural correlates of interoception: Effects of interoceptive focus and relationship to dimensional measures of body awareness. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017; 38(12):6068-6082. PMC: 5757871. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23811. View