» Articles » PMID: 35329871

Thoracic Curve Correction Ratio: An Objective Measure to Guide Against Overcorrection of a Main Thoracic Curve in the Setting of a Structural Proximal Thoracic Curve

Abstract

Purpose: The correction of double thoracic (Lenke 2) curves has been associated with higher rates of postoperative shoulder imbalance that may compromise long-term outcomes following spinal deformity correction. A number of methods have been proposed to mitigate this risk, though no accepted standard measurement exists. The purpose of this study is to validate a novel quantitative method of determining the relative curve correction magnitude in double thoracic curves. Methods: Retrospective data from a multi-center database of patients undergoing surgical correction of left-proximal thoracic, right-main thoracic Lenke 2 curves were analyzed. A novel measurement tool, the Thoracic Curve Correction Ratio (TCCR), was applied for the purposes of validation against historical data. Results: A total of 305 patients with complete two-year follow-up data were included. The TCCR, or the ratio of postoperative percent correction of the thoracic curves divided by the ratio of the preoperative curve magnitudes, displayed a significant negative correlation (Pearson R = −0.66; p < 0.001) with T1 tilt at two years postoperatively. Conclusions: The TCCR could be added as an important factor in the preoperative planning process and intraoperative assessment in order to reduce postoperative T1 tilt. While T1 tilt remains an imperfect surrogate measure for clinical shoulder balance, it serves as one of many potential measures that the surgeon may evaluate quantitatively and radiographically.

Citing Articles

The Influence of Relative Curve Correction and Upper Instrumented Vertebra (UIV) Tilt Angle on Post-operative Shoulder Balance Following Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF) in Lenke Type 1 and 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) Patients.

Wei Chan C, Hong N, Chandirasegaran S, Chiu C, Kwan M Global Spine J. 2025; :21925682251325171.

PMID: 40020691 PMC: 11871575. DOI: 10.1177/21925682251325171.


The Risk and Benefits of Various Innovations in Fusion and Fusionless Surgery for AIS.

Schlosser T, Trobisch P J Clin Med. 2023; 12(13).

PMID: 37445585 PMC: 10342528. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134552.

References
1.
Amir D, Yaszay B, Bartley C, Bastrom T, Newton P . Does Leveling the Upper Thoracic Spine Have Any Impact on Postoperative Clinical Shoulder Balance in Lenke 1 and 2 Patients?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41(14):1122-1127. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001497. View

2.
Chang D, Kim J, Kim S, Lim D, Ha K, Suk S . How to improve shoulder balance in the surgical correction of double thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(23):E1359-67. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000578. View

3.
Lenke L, Bridwell K, OBrien M, Baldus C, Blanke K . Recognition and treatment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19(14):1589-97. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199407001-00007. View

4.
Winter R . The idiopathic double thoracic curve pattern. Its recognition and surgical management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989; 14(12):1287-92. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198912000-00003. View

5.
PONSETI I, Friedman B . Prognosis in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1950; 32A(2):381-95. View