» Articles » PMID: 35328227

Gene Expression Analysis of Biphasic Pleural Mesothelioma: New Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Mar 25
PMID 35328227
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biphasic is the second most common histotype of pleural mesothelioma (PM). It shares epithelioid and sarcomatoid features and is challenging to diagnose. The aim of this study was to identify biphasic PM markers to improve subtyping and prognosis definition. The expression levels of 117 cancer genes, evaluated using the nanoString system, were compared between the three major histotypes (epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic), and expression differences within biphasic PM were evaluated in relation to the percentage of epithelioid components. Biphasic PM overexpressed and in comparison to sarcomatoid, and and in comparison to epithelioid PM. , , , , and were deregulated among all histotypes, leading to the hypothesis of a gradual expression from epithelioid to sarcomatoid PM. According to gene expression, biphasic PM samples were divided in two clusters with a significant difference in the epithelioid component. , , and were overexpressed in the biphasic group with a low percentage of epithelioid component. Survival analysis using TCGA data showed that high and expression levels correlate with poor survival in PM patients. Herein, we identified markers with the potential to improve diagnosis and prognostic stratification of biphasic PM, which is still an orphan tumor.

Citing Articles

Validation of a Gene Expression Approach for the Cytological Diagnosis of Epithelioid and Biphasic Pleural Mesothelioma on a Consecutive Series.

Bruno R, Poma A, Ali G, Proietti A, Ribechini A, Chella A Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(23).

PMID: 38067238 PMC: 10705177. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235534.


New Immunohistochemical Markers for Pleural Mesothelioma Subtyping.

Di Stefano I, Ali G, Poma A, Bruno R, Proietti A, Niccoli C Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(18).

PMID: 37761312 PMC: 10529020. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13182945.

References
1.
Creaney J, Robinson B . Malignant Mesothelioma Biomarkers: From Discovery to Use in Clinical Practice for Diagnosis, Monitoring, Screening, and Treatment. Chest. 2016; 152(1):143-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.12.004. View

2.
Guan Z, Zhang J, Song S, Dai D . Promoter methylation and expression of TIMP3 gene in gastric cancer. Diagn Pathol. 2013; 8:110. PMC: 3737241. DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-8-110. View

3.
Bueno R, Stawiski E, Goldstein L, Durinck S, De Rienzo A, Modrusan Z . Comprehensive genomic analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma identifies recurrent mutations, gene fusions and splicing alterations. Nat Genet. 2016; 48(4):407-16. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3520. View

4.
Bruno R, Ali G, Giannini R, Proietti A, Lucchi M, Chella A . Malignant pleural mesothelioma and mesothelial hyperplasia: A new molecular tool for the differential diagnosis. Oncotarget. 2016; 8(2):2758-2770. PMC: 5356839. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13174. View

5.
Pastan I, Hassan R . Discovery of mesothelin and exploiting it as a target for immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2014; 74(11):2907-12. PMC: 4062095. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0337. View