» Articles » PMID: 35327712

Short Versions of the Arabic Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire for Yemeni Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Derivation and Validation

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2022 Mar 25
PMID 35327712
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To shorten the 24-item Arabic Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ(A)) for adolescents in Yemen. Material and methods: Two shortening methods derived six-item and nine-item versions: the item impact method selected items with the highest impact scores as rated by 30 participants in each subscale; and the regression method was applied using data of 385 participants from the PIDAQ(A) validity study, with the total PIDAQ(A) score as the dependent variable, and its individual items as the independent variables. The four derived versions were assessed for validity and reliability. Results: The means of the six-item and nine-item short versions of both methods were close. Cronbach’s alpha values extended from 0.90 to 0.92 (intra-class correlations = 0.85−0.88). In criterion validity, strong significant correlations were detected between scores of all short versions and the 24-item PIDAQ(A) score (0.96−0.98; p < 0.001). Construct validity displayed significant associations among all short versions and self-perceived dental appearance rank and self-perceived need for orthodontic braces rank (p < 0.05). Mean scores of all short versions were significantly different between adolescents with severe malocclusion and those with slight malocclusion in discriminant validity tests. In conclusion, all PIDAQ(A) short versions are valid and reliable.

Citing Articles

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire.

Fidalgo J, Botelho J, Proenca L, Mendes J, Machado V, Sintra Delgado A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(16).

PMID: 36011570 PMC: 9408633. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19169931.


Validation of the Simplified Malaysian Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire for the Sociodental Approach to Estimate the Orthodontic Treatment Need.

Wan Hassan W, Makhbul M, Othman S, Yusof Z Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(14).

PMID: 35886519 PMC: 9324681. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148665.

References
1.
Nurelhuda N, Ahmed M, Trovik T, Astrom A . Evaluation of oral health-related quality of life among Sudanese schoolchildren using Child-OIDP inventory. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010; 8:152. PMC: 3019139. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-152. View

2.
Cottrell E, Roddy E, Rathod T, Thomas E, Porcheret M, Foster N . Maximising response from GPs to questionnaire surveys: do length or incentives make a difference?. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015; 15:3. PMC: 4293861. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-15-3. View

3.
Klages U, Claus N, Wehrbein H, Zentner A . Development of a questionnaire for assessment of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in young adults. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 28(2):103-11. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cji083. View

4.
John M, Miglioretti D, LeResche L, Koepsell T, Hujoel P, Micheelis W . German short forms of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006; 34(4):277-88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00279.x. View

5.
Sischo L, Broder H . Oral health-related quality of life: what, why, how, and future implications. J Dent Res. 2011; 90(11):1264-70. PMC: 3318061. DOI: 10.1177/0022034511399918. View