Cross-Sectional Questionnaire of Donkey Owners and Farriers Regarding Farriery Practices in the Faisalabad Region of Pakistan

Overview

Journal Animals (Basel)

Date 2022 Mar 25

PMID 35327105

Authors

Raja Zabeeh Ullah Khan

Sarah Margaret Rosanowski

Waqar Saleem

Rebecca Sarah Victoria Parkes

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Quality farriery is essential to ensure donkey welfare, and many intervention programs in low-middle income countries (LMICs) train farriers, and educate owners, regarding the farriery needs of donkeys. It is essential for interventional programs to understand the perspectives of all stakeholders in donkey-owning communities. A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted in the Faisalabad region of Pakistan. Ten farriers and 55 donkey owners participated in the study. Farriers reported receiving no formal training for farriery, insufficient wages (PKR 65 or USD 0.36 per hoof) and the requirement to use traditional tools. Farriers reported an average shoeing time of 5 min per hoof and shoeing between three and 30 donkeys a day. Donkeys were mostly shod while they were harnessed to a cart. Six donkey-owning farriers reported shoeing their donkeys every 20 to 25 days. Owners reported varying shoeing intervals of 20 days to 90 days. Shoeing interval was also affected by seasonal and weather changes. Owners considered their relationship with farriers as the most important factor in choosing a farrier rather than cost. A majority (87%) of the owners reported lameness in their donkeys. The study provides important insights into the many challenges and opportunities in developing quality donkey farriery in the region.

Citing Articles

The behavior and welfare of neglected species: some examples from fish and mammals.

Bukhari S, Parkes R, Sneddon L, McElligott A PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17149.

PMID: 38560452 PMC: 10981888. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17149.

Assessing the impact of draught load pulling on welfare in equids.

Bukhari S, Parkes R Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1214015.

PMID: 37662986 PMC: 10469728. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1214015.

Recognition of emotion and pain by owners benefits the welfare of donkeys in a challenging working environment.

Bukhari S, McElligott A, Rosanowski S, Parkes R PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15747.

PMID: 37576503 PMC: 10416770. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15747.

Trialling Locally Made, Low-Cost Bits to Improve Bit-Related Welfare Problems in Cart Horses: Findings from a Study in Senegal.

Seck M, Jobling R, Brown A Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36611612 PMC: 9817802. DOI: 10.3390/ani13010002.

Welfare Concerns for Mounted Load Carrying by Working Donkeys in Pakistan.

Bukhari S, Rosanowski S, McElligott A, Parkes R Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:886020.

PMID: 35692297 PMC: 9186103. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.886020.

References

Luna D, Tadich T . Why Should Human-Animal Interactions Be Included in Research of Working Equids' Welfare?. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(2). PMC: 6406816. DOI: 10.3390/ani9020042. View

Reix C, Burn C, Pritchard J, Barr A, Whay H . The range and prevalence of clinical signs and conformation associated with lameness in working draught donkeys in Pakistan. Equine Vet J. 2014; 46(6):771-7. DOI: 10.1111/evj.12231. View

Orth E, Navas Gonzalez F, Pastrana C, Berger J, le Jeune S, Davis E . Development of a Donkey Grimace Scale to Recognize Pain in Donkeys () Post Castration. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(8). PMC: 7459673. DOI: 10.3390/ani10081411. View

Norris S, Little H, Ryding J, Raw Z . Global donkey and mule populations: Figures and trends. PLoS One. 2021; 16(2):e0247830. PMC: 7906361. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247830. View

Hussain M, Saeed Z, Gulsher M, Shaikh R, Ali M, Ahmad A . A report on the molecular detection and seasonal prevalence of Trypanosoma brucei in Dromedary Camels from Dera Ghazi Khan District in Southern Punjab (Pakistan). Trop Biomed. 2021; 33(2):268-275. View

Reix C, Dikshit A, Hockenhull J, Parker R, Banerjee A, Burn C . A two-year participatory intervention project with owners to reduce lameness and limb abnormalities in working horses in Jaipur, India. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0124342. PMC: 4405470. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124342. View

Bukhari S, McElligott A, Parkes R . Quantifying the Impact of Mounted Load Carrying on Equids: A Review. Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(5). PMC: 8151148. DOI: 10.3390/ani11051333. View

Pritchard J, Lindberg A, Main D, Whay H . Assessment of the welfare of working horses, mules and donkeys, using health and behaviour parameters. Prev Vet Med. 2005; 69(3-4):265-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.002. View

Merriam J . The role and importance of farriery in equine veterinary practice. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2003; 19(2):273-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0739(03)00022-1. View

10.

Haddy E, Burden F, Prado-Ortiz O, Zappi H, Raw Z, Proops L . Comparison of working equid welfare across three regions of Mexico. Equine Vet J. 2020; 53(4):763-770. DOI: 10.1111/evj.13349. View

11.

Bukhari S, Rosanowski S, McElligott A, Parkes R . Welfare Concerns for Mounted Load Carrying by Working Donkeys in Pakistan. Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:886020. PMC: 9186103. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.886020. View

12.

Frohlich N, Sells P, Sommerville R, Bolwell C, Cantley C, Martin J . Welfare Assessment and Husbandry Practices of Working Horses in Fiji. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(3). PMC: 7142562. DOI: 10.3390/ani10030392. View

13.

Afridi M, Mian A, Saqib M, Abbas G, Ali J, Mansoor M . Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Infection in Equines from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan. Iran J Parasitol. 2018; 12(4):597-605. PMC: 5756310. View

14.

Barrio E, Rickards K, Thiemann A . Clinical Evaluation and Preventative Care in Donkeys. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2019; 35(3):545-560. DOI: 10.1016/j.cveq.2019.08.013. View

15.

Thiemann A, Poore L . Hoof Disorders and Farriery in the Donkey. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2019; 35(3):643-658. DOI: 10.1016/j.cveq.2019.08.012. View

16.

Khan R, Rosanowski S, Parkes R . Hoof morphometry in a population of lame and nonlame working donkeys in Pakistan. Equine Vet J. 2022; 55(3):435-445. DOI: 10.1111/evj.13861. View

17.

Mohite D, Sheikh C, Singh S, Kalita J, Williams S, Compston P . Using Qualitative Methods to Explore Farrier-Related Barriers to Successful Farriery Interventions for Equine Welfare in India. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(5). PMC: 6562430. DOI: 10.3390/ani9050252. View

18.

Sommerville R, Brown A, Upjohn M . A standardised equine-based welfare assessment tool used for six years in low and middle income countries. PLoS One. 2018; 13(2):e0192354. PMC: 5821349. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192354. View

19.

Pfau T, Parkes R, Burden E, Bell N, Fairhurst H, Witte T . Movement asymmetry in working polo horses. Equine Vet J. 2015; 48(4):517-22. DOI: 10.1111/evj.12467. View

20.

Ghori M, Khan M, Ali Khan J, Rabbani M, Shabbir M, Chaudhry H . Seroprevalence and risk factors of glanders in working equines - Findings of a cross-sectional study in Punjab province of Pakistan. Acta Trop. 2017; 176:134-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.07.031. View