» Articles » PMID: 35326348

Do Older and Younger Adults Prefer the Positive or Avoid the Negative?

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Mar 25
PMID 35326348
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Affective information is processed in different ways across one's lifespan. Explanations for this pattern of performance are multiple and range from top-down motivational shifts and cognitive control to faster bottom-up and implicit processes. In this study, we aimed to investigate implicit affective information processing and positivity effects by examining performance in a modified version of the dot-probe task across three image-pair conditions (positive/neutral; negative/neutral; and positive/negative). We examined data from 50 older adults and 50 younger adults. The results showed that affective information processing varies with age and valence and that age effects in affective processing may occur early during information processing. Positivity biases emerge in both younger and older adults. However, while younger adults seem to prioritize positive information independently of context, older adults showed this prioritization only when presented in an emotional (i.e., negative) context. Moreover, older adults showed a tendency to avoid negative information whereas younger adults showed a general bias for affective content modulated by image-pair context.

Citing Articles

Auditory guidance of eye movements toward threat-related images in the absence of visual awareness.

Hu J, Badde S, Vetter P Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1441915.

PMID: 39175660 PMC: 11338778. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1441915.


What if Hitler had won WWII and met Kennedy in 1964? Perception and evaluation of counterfactual historical fiction.

Kakimova A, Salgaro M Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1332703.

PMID: 39045505 PMC: 11265284. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1332703.


More organized white matter is associated with positivity bias in older adults.

Viher P, Seitz-Holland J, Schulz M, Kensinger E, Karmacharya S, Swisher T Brain Imaging Behav. 2024; 18(3):555-565.

PMID: 38270836 PMC: 11222031. DOI: 10.1007/s11682-024-00850-5.


Age-related reduction in trait anxiety: Behavioral and neural evidence of automaticity in negative facial emotion processing.

Chaudhary S, Zhang S, Zhornitsky S, Chen Y, Chao H, Li C Neuroimage. 2023; 276:120207.

PMID: 37263454 PMC: 10330646. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120207.


Novel Approaches to Memory and Aging: The Editorial.

Padulo C, Fairfield B Brain Sci. 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36979328 PMC: 10046762. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13030518.


References
1.
Britton J, Taylor S, Sudheimer K, Liberzon I . Facial expressions and complex IAPS pictures: common and differential networks. Neuroimage. 2006; 31(2):906-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.050. View

2.
Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P . "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3):189-98. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. View

3.
Gruhn D, Scheibe S . Age-related differences in valence and arousal ratings of pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS): do ratings become more extreme with age?. Behav Res Methods. 2008; 40(2):512-21. DOI: 10.3758/brm.40.2.512. View

4.
Mikels J, Fredrickson B, Larkin G, Lindberg C, Maglio S, Reuter-Lorenz P . Emotional category data on images from the International Affective Picture System. Behav Res Methods. 2006; 37(4):626-30. PMC: 1808555. DOI: 10.3758/bf03192732. View

5.
Mather M, Carstensen L . Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(10):496-502. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005. View