» Articles » PMID: 35325705

Percolation Across Households in Mechanistic Models of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions in SARS-CoV-2 Disease Dynamics

Abstract

Since the emergence of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), mathematical modelling has become an important tool for planning strategies to combat the pandemic by supporting decision-making and public policies, as well as allowing an assessment of the effect of different intervention scenarios. A proliferation of compartmental models were developed by the mathematical modelling community in order to understand and make predictions about the spread of COVID-19. While compartmental models are suitable for simulating large populations, the underlying assumption of a well-mixed population might be problematic when considering non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) which have a major impact on the connectivity between individuals in a population. Here we propose a modification to an extended age-structured SEIR (susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered) framework, with dynamic transmission modelled using contact matrices for various settings in Brazil. By assuming that the mitigation strategies for COVID-19 affect the connections among different households, network percolation theory predicts that the connectivity among all households decreases drastically above a certain threshold of removed connections. We incorporated this emergent effect at population level by modulating home contact matrices through a percolation correction function, with the few additional parameters fitted to hospitalisation and mortality data from the city of São Paulo. Our model with percolation effects was better supported by the data than the same model without such effects. By allowing a more reliable assessment of the impact of NPIs, our improved model provides a better description of the epidemiological dynamics and, consequently, better policy recommendations.

Citing Articles

Modelling the impact of school reopening and contact tracing strategies on Covid-19 dynamics in different epidemiologic settings in Brazil.

Borges M, Ferreira L, Poloni S, Maria Bagattini A, Franco C, Quarti Machado da Rosa M Glob Epidemiol. 2022; 4:100094.

PMID: 36404949 PMC: 9652103. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100094.


Epidemic SI COVID-19 modeling in LMICs: Accompanying commentary.

Pan-Ngum W, Clapham H, Dawa J, Pulliam J Epidemics. 2022; 41:100651.

PMID: 36400691 PMC: 9621610. DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100651.

References
1.
Stroud P, Sydoriak S, Riese J, Smith J, Mniszewski S, Romero P . Semi-empirical power-law scaling of new infection rate to model epidemic dynamics with inhomogeneous mixing. Math Biosci. 2006; 203(2):301-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2006.01.007. View

2.
Liu W, Hethcote H, Levin S . Dynamical behavior of epidemiological models with nonlinear incidence rates. J Math Biol. 1987; 25(4):359-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF00277162. View

3.
Adam D . Special report: The simulations driving the world's response to COVID-19. Nature. 2020; 580(7803):316-318. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-01003-6. View

4.
Flaxman S, Mishra S, Gandy A, Unwin H, Mellan T, Coupland H . Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe. Nature. 2020; 584(7820):257-261. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7. View

5.
Silva L, Lima A, Polli D, Razia P, Pavao L, Cavalcanti M . Social distancing measures in the fight against COVID-19 in Brazil: description and epidemiological analysis by state. Cad Saude Publica. 2020; 36(9):e00185020. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311X00185020. View