» Articles » PMID: 35324598

The Effectiveness of the Use of Regdanvimab (CT-P59) in Addition to Remdesivir in Patients with Severe COVID-19: A Single Center Retrospective Study

Overview
Date 2022 Mar 24
PMID 35324598
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) still has a high mortality rate when it is severe. Regdanvimab (CT-P59), a neutralizing monoclonal antibody that has been proven effective against mild to moderate COVID-19, may be effective against severe COVID-19. This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the combined use of remdesivir and regdanvimab in patients with severe COVID-19.

Methods: From March to early May 2021, 124 patients with severe COVID-19 were admitted to Ulsan University Hospital (Ulsan, Korea) and received oxygen therapy and remdesivir. Among them, 25 were also administered regdanvimab before remdesivir. We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes between the remdesivir alone group [ = 99 (79.8%)] and the regdanvimab/remdesivir group [ = 25 (20.2%)].

Results: The oxygen-free days on day 28 (primary outcome) were significantly higher in the regdanvimab/remdesivir group [mean ± SD: 19.36 ± 7.87 vs. 22.72 ± 3.66, = 0.003]. The oxygen-free days was also independently associated with use of regdanvimab in the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for initial pulse oximetric saturation (SpO)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO) ratio (severity index). Further, in the regdanvimab/remdesivir group, the lowest SpO/FiO ratio during treatment was significantly higher (mean ± SD: 237.05 ± 89.68 vs. 295.63 ± 72.74, = 0.003), and the Kaplan-Meier estimates of oxygen supplementation days in surviving patients (on day 28) were significantly shorter [mean ± SD: 8.24 ± 7.43 vs. 5.28 ± 3.66, = 0.024].

Conclusions: In patients with severe COVID-19, clinical outcomes can be improved by administering regdanvimab, in addition to remdesivir.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of regdanvimab on mortality in COVID-19 infected patients on hemodialysis.

Kee Y, Park H, Yoon S, Yu S, Ko E, Cho A Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2024; 43(1):111-121.

PMID: 38268125 PMC: 10846986. DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.23.137.


COVID-19: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Leggat P, Frean J, Blumberg L Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023; 8(2).

PMID: 36828510 PMC: 9966066. DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed8020094.

References
1.
Horby P, Lim W, Emberson J, Mafham M, Bell J, Linsell L . Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020; 384(8):693-704. PMC: 7383595. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436. View

2.
Rice T, Wheeler A, Bernard G, Hayden D, Schoenfeld D, Ware L . Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. Chest. 2007; 132(2):410-7. DOI: 10.1378/chest.07-0617. View

3.
Taylor P, Adams A, Hufford M, de la Torre I, Winthrop K, Gottlieb R . Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID-19. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021; 21(6):382-393. PMC: 8054133. DOI: 10.1038/s41577-021-00542-x. View

4.
Kim J, Jang Y, Hong J, Jung J, Park J, Streinu-Cercel A . Safety, Virologic Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of CT-P59, a Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody Against SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding Protein: Two Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I Studies in Healthy Individuals and Patients With Mild.... Clin Ther. 2021; 43(10):1706-1727. PMC: 8380488. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.08.009. View

5.
Borghesi A, Maroldi R . COVID-19 outbreak in Italy: experimental chest X-ray scoring system for quantifying and monitoring disease progression. Radiol Med. 2020; 125(5):509-513. PMC: 7194501. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-020-01200-3. View