» Articles » PMID: 35324239

Mnemicity Versus Temporality: Distinguishing Between Components of Episodic Representations

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2022 Mar 24
PMID 35324239
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human beings regularly "mentally travel" to past and future times in memory and imagination. In theory, whether an event is remembered or imagined (its "mnemicity") underspecifies whether it is oriented toward the past or the future (its "temporality"). However, it remains unclear to what extent the temporal orientation of such episodic simulations is cognitively represented separately from their status as memory or imagination. To address this question, we investigated to what extent episodic simulations are distinguishable in recall by virtue of both temporal orientation and mnemicity. In three experiments ( = 360), participants were asked to generate and later recall events differing along the lines of temporal orientation (past/future) and mnemicity (remembered/imagined). Across all of our experiments, we found that mnemicity and temporality each contributed to participants' ability to discriminate different types of event simulations in recall. However, participants were also consistently more likely to confuse in recall event simulations that shared the same temporal orientation rather than the same mnemicity. These results show that the temporal orientation of episodic simulations can be cognitively represented separately from their mnemicity and have implications for debates about the structure of episodic representations as well as the role of temporality in this structure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Episodic recombination and the role of time in mental travel.

Mahr J, Schacter D Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1913):20230409.

PMID: 39278249 PMC: 11496720. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0409.


Mnemicity: A Cognitive Gadget?.

Mahr J, van Bergen P, Sutton J, Schacter D, Heyes C Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023; 18(5):1160-1177.

PMID: 36649218 PMC: 11759954. DOI: 10.1177/17456916221141352.

References
1.
Addis D, Wong A, Schacter D . Age-related changes in the episodic simulation of future events. Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(1):33-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02043.x. View

2.
Klein S . Autonoetic consciousness: Reconsidering the role of episodic memory in future-oriented self-projection. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015; 69(2):381-401. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1007150. View

3.
Schacter D, Madore K . Remembering the past and imagining the future: Identifying and enhancing the contribution of episodic memory. Mem Stud. 2017; 9(3):245-255. PMC: 5289412. DOI: 10.1177/1750698016645230. View

4.
Epstude K, Roese N . The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2008; 12(2):168-92. PMC: 2408534. DOI: 10.1177/1088868308316091. View

5.
Schacter D, Addis D, Buckner R . Episodic simulation of future events: concepts, data, and applications. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008; 1124:39-60. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1440.001. View