» Articles » PMID: 35323686

Establishing Imaging Biomarkers of Host Immune System Efficacy During Glioblastoma Therapy Response: Challenges, Obstacles and Future Perspectives

Overview
Journal Metabolites
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Mar 24
PMID 35323686
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This hypothesis proposal addresses three major questions: (1) Why do we need imaging biomarkers for assessing the efficacy of immune system participation in glioblastoma therapy response? (2) Why are they not available yet? and (3) How can we produce them? We summarize the literature data supporting the claim that the immune system is behind the efficacy of most successful glioblastoma therapies but, unfortunately, there are no current short-term imaging biomarkers of its activity. We also discuss how using an immunocompetent murine model of glioblastoma, allowing the cure of mice and the generation of immune memory, provides a suitable framework for glioblastoma therapy response biomarker studies. Both magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-based metabolomic data (i.e., magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging) can provide non-invasive assessments of such a system. A predictor based in nosological images, generated from magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging analyses and their oscillatory patterns, should be translational to clinics. We also review hurdles that may explain why such an oscillatory biomarker was not reported in previous imaging glioblastoma work. Single shot explorations that neglect short-term oscillatory behavior derived from immune system attack on tumors may mislead actual response extent detection. Finally, we consider improvements required to properly predict immune system-mediated early response (1-2 weeks) to therapy. The sensible use of improved biomarkers may enable translatable evidence-based therapeutic protocols, with the possibility of extending preclinical results to human patients.

Citing Articles

Correlation of MR-Based Metabolomics and Molecular Profiling in the Tumor Microenvironment of Temozolomide-Treated Orthotopic GL261 Glioblastoma in Mice.

Zhao K, Calero-Perez P, Bopp M, Moschl V, Pagenstecher A, Mulero-Acevedo M Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(24).

PMID: 38139457 PMC: 10743933. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242417628.


Imaging and Spectroscopic-Based Methods to Understand Cancer Metabolism and Biology.

Madhu B Metabolites. 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37623883 PMC: 10456931. DOI: 10.3390/metabo13080940.

References
1.
Saenz-Antonanzas A, Auzmendi-Iriarte J, Carrasco-Garcia E, Moreno-Cugnon L, Ruiz I, Villanua J . Liquid Biopsy in Glioblastoma: Opportunities, Applications and Challenges. Cancers (Basel). 2019; 11(7). PMC: 6679205. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11070950. View

2.
Nesseler J, Schaue D, McBride W, Lee M, Kaprealian T, Niclou S . Irradiation to Improve the Response to Immunotherapeutic Agents in Glioblastomas. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019; 4(2):268-282. PMC: 6460102. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.11.005. View

3.
Matulewicz L, Sokol M, Michnik A, Wydmanski J . Long-term normal-appearing brain tissue monitoring after irradiation using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vivo: statistical analysis of a large group of patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 66(3):825-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.06.001. View

4.
Wang Q, He Z, Huang M, Liu T, Wang Y, Xu H . Vascular niche IL-6 induces alternative macrophage activation in glioblastoma through HIF-2α. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):559. PMC: 5805734. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03050-0. View

5.
Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Warren S, Adjemian S, Agostinis P, Buque Martinez A . Consensus guidelines for the definition, detection and interpretation of immunogenic cell death. J Immunother Cancer. 2020; 8(1). PMC: 7064135. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000337. View