» Articles » PMID: 35323615

Sex Differences in the Evaluation of Congestion Markers in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Abstract

The impact of sex on the assessment of congestion in acute heart failure (AHF) is still a matter of debate. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate sex differences in the evaluation of congestion at admission in patients hospitalized for AHF. We consecutively enrolled 494 AHF patients (252 female). Clinical congestion assessment, B-type natriuretic peptide levels analysis, blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio (BUN/Cr), plasma volume status estimate (by means of Duarte or Kaplam-Hakim PVS), and hydration status evaluation through bioimpedance analysis were performed. There was no difference in medications between men and women. Women were older (79 ± 9 yrs vs. 77 ± 10 yrs, p = 0.005), and had higher left ventricular ejection fraction (45 ± 11% vs. 38 ± 11%, p < 0.001), and lower creatinine clearance (42 ± 25 mL/min vs. 47 ± 26 mL/min, p = 0.04). The prevalence of peripheral oedema, orthopnoea, and jugular venous distention were not significantly different between women and men. BUN/Cr (27 ± 9 vs. 23 ± 13, p = 0.04) and plasma volume were higher in women than men (Duarte PVS: 6.0 ± 1.5 dL/g vs. 5.1 ± 1.5 dL/g, p < 0.001; Kaplam−Hakim PVS: 7.9 ± 13% vs. −7.3 ± 12%, p < 0.001). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, female sex was independently associated with BUN/Cr and PVS. Female sex was independently associated with subclinical biomarkers of congestion such as BUN/Cr and PVS in patients with AHF. A sex-guided approach to the correct evaluation of patients with AHF might become the cornerstone for the correct management of these patients.

Citing Articles

Chronic Heart Failure Management: Monitoring Patients and Intercepting Exacerbations.

Piccirillo G, Moscucci F, Sciomer S, Magri D Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 24(7):208.

PMID: 39077011 PMC: 11266474. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2407208.


Sex Differences in Repolarization Markers: Telemonitoring for Chronic Heart Failure Patients.

Moscucci F, Sciomer S, Maffei S, Meloni A, Lospinuso I, Carnovale M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(14).

PMID: 37510828 PMC: 10381165. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144714.

References
1.
Meyer S, van der Meer P, Massie B, OConnor C, Metra M, Ponikowski P . Sex-specific acute heart failure phenotypes and outcomes from PROTECT. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013; 15(12):1374-81. DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft115. View

2.
Pimenta J, Paulo C, Mascarenhas J, Gomes A, Azevedo A, Rocha-Goncalves F . BNP at discharge in acute heart failure patients: is it all about volemia? A study using impedance cardiography to assess fluid and hemodynamic status. Int J Cardiol. 2009; 145(2):209-214. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.08.001. View

3.
Ho J, Enserro D, Brouwers F, Kizer J, Shah S, Psaty B . Predicting Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction: The International Collaboration on Heart Failure Subtypes. Circ Heart Fail. 2016; 9(6). PMC: 4902276. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.003116. View

4.
Drazner M, Rame J, Stevenson L, Dries D . Prognostic importance of elevated jugular venous pressure and a third heart sound in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(8):574-81. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa010641. View

5.
Dewan P, Rorth R, Raparelli V, Campbell R, Shen L, Jhund P . Sex-Related Differences in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Circ Heart Fail. 2019; 12(12):e006539. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006539. View