» Articles » PMID: 35323427

Portable FRET-Based Biosensor Device for On-Site Lead Detection

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Mar 24
PMID 35323427
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most methods for measuring environmental lead (Pb) content are time consuming, expensive, hazardous, and restricted to specific analytical systems. To provide a facile, safe tool to detect Pb, we created pMet-lead, a portable fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based Pb-biosensor. The pMet-lead device comprises a 3D-printed frame housing a 405-nm laser diode-an excitation source for fluorescence emission images (YFP and CFP)-accompanied by optical filters, a customized sample holder with a Met-lead 1.44 M1 (the most recent version)-embedded biochip, and an optical lens aligned for smartphone compatibility. Measuring the emission ratios (Y/C) of the FRET components enabled Pb detection with a dynamic range of nearly 2 (1.96), a pMet-lead/Pb dissociation constant (K) 45.62 nM, and a limit of detection 24 nM (0.474 μg/dL, 4.74 ppb). To mitigate earlier problems with a lack of selectivity for Pb vs. zinc, we preincubated samples with tricine, a low-affinity zinc chelator. We validated the pMet-lead measurements of the characterized laboratory samples and unknown samples from six regions in Taiwan by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Notably, two unknown samples had Y/C ratios significantly higher than that of the control (3.48 ± 0.08 and 3.74 ± 0.12 vs. 2.79 ± 0.02), along with Pb concentrations (10.6 ppb and 15.24 ppb) above the WHO-permitted level of 10 ppb in tap water, while the remaining four unknowns showed no detectable Pb upon ICP-MS. These results demonstrate that pMet-lead provides a rapid, sensitive means for on-site Pb detection in water from the environment and in living/drinking supply systems to prevent potential Pb poisoning.

Citing Articles

Accurate and Convenient Lung Cancer Diagnosis through Detection of Extracellular Vesicle Membrane Proteins via Förster Resonance Energy Transfer.

Xiao S, Yao Y, Liao S, Xu B, Li X, Zhang Y Nano Lett. 2023; 23(17):8115-8125.

PMID: 37643406 PMC: 10510723. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02193.


Developments in FRET- and BRET-Based Biosensors.

Wu Y, Jiang T Micromachines (Basel). 2022; 13(10).

PMID: 36296141 PMC: 9610962. DOI: 10.3390/mi13101789.


Sensors for Environmental Monitoring and Food Safety.

Honeychurch K, Piano M Biosensors (Basel). 2022; 12(6).

PMID: 35735513 PMC: 9220911. DOI: 10.3390/bios12060366.


Solving Color Reproducibility between Digital Devices: A Robust Approach of Smartphones Color Management for Chemical (Bio)Sensors.

Cebrian P, Perez-Sienes L, Sanz-Vicente I, Lopez-Molinero A, de Marcos S, Galban J Biosensors (Basel). 2022; 12(5).

PMID: 35624642 PMC: 9139083. DOI: 10.3390/bios12050341.

References
1.
Suwa H, Triller A, Drapeau P, Legendre P . High-affinity zinc potentiation of inhibitory postsynaptic glycinergic currents in the zebrafish hindbrain. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 85(2):912-25. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.2.912. View

2.
Switz N, DAmbrosio M, Fletcher D . Low-cost mobile phone microscopy with a reversed mobile phone camera lens. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e95330. PMC: 4031072. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095330. View

3.
Zhao W, Tian S, Huang L, Liu K, Dong L, Guo J . A smartphone-based biomedical sensory system. Analyst. 2020; 145(8):2873-2891. DOI: 10.1039/c9an02294e. View

4.
Zhu H, Yaglidere O, Su T, Tseng D, Ozcan A . Cost-effective and compact wide-field fluorescent imaging on a cell-phone. Lab Chip. 2010; 11(2):315-22. PMC: 3073081. DOI: 10.1039/c0lc00358a. View

5.
Caldwell K, Cheng P, Jarrett J, Makhmudov A, Vance K, Ward C . Measurement Challenges at Low Blood Lead Levels. Pediatrics. 2017; 140(2). PMC: 5709716. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-0272. View