Clinical Performance of Direct Composite Restorations in Patients with Amelogenesis Imperfecta - Anterior Restorations

Overview

Journal J Adhes Dent

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2022 Mar 24

PMID 35322945

Authors

Neslihan Tekce

Mustafa Demirci

Safa Tuncer

Gizem Guder

Elif Ilgi Sancak

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical performance of direct composite restorations using nanohybrid and nanofill composite materials in anterior teeth in patients with amelogenesis imperfecta (AI).

Materials And Methods: The study included 15 patients with AI aged 14-30 years. During the study, the patients received anterior direct composite laminate veneer restorations using either a nanohybrid (Clearfil Majesty ES-2 and Clearfil Universal Bond, Kuraray Noritake) or a nanofill resin composite (Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative and Single Bond Universal Adhesive, 3M Oral Care). The restorations were evaluated according to the modified USPHS criteria at baseline and at 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-year follow-up periods.

Results: The cumulative success rate of anterior restorations was 80.5% for nanohybrid and 92.5% for nanofill composite after 4 years. Eight restorations with nanohybrid and three restorations with nanofill resin composites failed. Ten restorations failed due to fracture; the fracture rate was 12.3%. Statistically significant differences were found between nanohybrid and nanofill composites regarding marginal discoloration and surface texture after 3 years. Furthermore, statistically significant differences were observed with respect to color match after 4 years.

Conclusion: The use of a nanohybrid or nanofill composite for anterior direct restorations in patients with AI was observed to be satisfactory, based on the rate of ideal and clinically acceptable restorations. The primary reason for restoration failure was fracture. The failure rate of nanohybrid composite restorations was higher than with nanofill composite restorations with respect to survival and marginal adaptation criteria.

Citing Articles

Clinical Survival Rate and Laboratory Failure of Dental Veneers: A Narrative Literature Review.

Alghazzawi T J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(5).

PMID: 38786642 PMC: 11122289. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15050131.

References

Lempel E, Lovasz B, Meszarics R, Jeges S, Toth A, Szalma J . Direct resin composite restorations for fractured maxillary teeth and diastema closure: A 7 years retrospective evaluation of survival and influencing factors. Dent Mater. 2017; 33(4):467-476. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.02.001. View

Mahmoud S, El-Embaby A, AbdAllah A . Clinical performance of ormocer, nanofilled, and nanoceramic resin composites in Class I and Class II restorations: a three-year evaluation. Oper Dent. 2013; 39(1):32-42. DOI: 10.2341/12-313-C. View

Strauch S, Hahnel S . Restorative Treatment in Patients with Amelogenesis Imperfecta: A Review. J Prosthodont. 2018; 27(7):618-623. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12736. View

Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M . From Buonocore's Pioneering Acid-Etch Technique to Self-Adhering Restoratives. A Status Perspective of Rapidly Advancing Dental Adhesive Technology. J Adhes Dent. 2020; 22(1):7-34. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a43994. View

Patil P, Patil S . Amelogenesis imperfecta with multiple impacted teeth and skeletal class III malocclusion: complete mouth rehabilitation of a young adult. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 111(1):11-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.010. View

Wright J, Deaton T, Hall K, Yamauchi M . The mineral and protein content of enamel in amelogenesis imperfecta. Connect Tissue Res. 1995; 32(1-4):247-52. DOI: 10.3109/03008209509013730. View

Crawford P, Aldred M, Bloch-Zupan A . Amelogenesis imperfecta. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007; 2:17. PMC: 1853073. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-2-17. View

Nasim I, Neelakantan P, Sujeer R, Subbarao C . Color stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanocomposite resins--an in vitro study. J Dent. 2010; 38 Suppl 2:e137-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.020. View

Saeidi Pour R, Edelhoff D, Prandtner O, Liebermann A . Rehabilitation of a patient with amelogenesis imperfecta using porcelain veneers and CAD/CAM polymer restorations: A clinical report. Quintessence Int. 2015; 46(10):843-52. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a34721. View

10.

Faria-E-Silva A, de Moraes R, Menezes M, Capanema R, De Moura A, Martelli Jr H . Hardness and microshear bond strength to enamel and dentin of permanent teeth with hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011; 21(4):314-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01129.x. View

11.

Demarco F, Cenci M, Lima F, Donassollo T, de Almeida Andre D, Leida F . Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings. J Dent. 2006; 35(3):231-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.011. View

12.

Pozos-Guillen A, Chavarria-Bolanos D, Garrocho-Rangel A . Split-mouth design in Paediatric Dentistry clinical trials. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017; 18(1):61-65. DOI: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.01.13. View

13.

Cvar J, Ryge G . Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Investig. 2005; 9(4):215-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-005-0018-z. View

14.

Agackiran E, Tumen E, Celenk S, Bolgul B, Atakul F . Restoring aesthetics and function in a young boy with hypomature amelogenesis imperfecta: a case report. ISRN Dent. 2011; 2011:586854. PMC: 3169809. DOI: 10.5402/2011/586854. View

15.

Demirci M, Uysal O . Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in Class I cavities: 3-year results. Am J Dent. 2007; 19(6):376-81. View

16.

Sabandal M, Schafer E . Amelogenesis imperfecta: review of diagnostic findings and treatment concepts. Odontology. 2016; 104(3):245-56. DOI: 10.1007/s10266-016-0266-1. View

17.

Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G . The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent. 1998; 26(1):1-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00070-x. View

18.

Millet C, Duprez J, Khoury C, Morgon L, Richard B . Interdisciplinary Care for a Patient with Amelogenesis Imperfecta: A Clinical Report. J Prosthodont. 2014; 24(5):424-31. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12242. View

19.

Seow W, Amaratunge A . The effects of acid-etching on enamel from different clinical variants of amelogenesis imperfecta: an SEM study. Pediatr Dent. 1998; 20(1):37-42. View

20.

Yamaguti P, Acevedo A, de Paula L . Rehabilitation of an adolescent with autosomal dominant amelogenesis imperfecta: case report. Oper Dent. 2006; 31(2):266-72. DOI: 10.2341/05-1. View