» Articles » PMID: 35322405

Telehealth for Gynaecology Outpatients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patient and Clinician Experiences

Overview
Date 2022 Mar 24
PMID 35322405
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated alterations in provision of health care and how patients access it. Telehealth has replaced traditional face-to-face outpatient clinics in an unprecedented manner. This study aimed to assess overall patient and clinician satisfaction with telehealth consultations, to establish acceptability of telehealth during pandemic and non-pandemic times, and document feedback.

Materials And Methods: A prospective observational study involving women presenting to a general gynaecology outpatient department was performed. Women who attended for consultation between 13 July and 4 September 2020 were invited to participate in a questionnaire following their telehealth appointment. Clinicians consulting in the outpatient department were invited to complete a questionnaire at the end of the eight-week study period. Satisfaction, utility and acceptability data were obtained using visual analogue scales (VAS).

Results: Twenty-six out of 56 (46.4%) clinicians and 124/870 (14.3%) patients completed the questionnaire. Patients who responded were older and more likely to have been born in Australia than women who did not (P = 0.0355 and P = 0.005, respectively). Overall patient satisfaction with telehealth was high (median VAS (interquartile range), 8.6 (5.6-9.8)). More women found telehealth to be acceptable during a pandemic than afterward (8.9 vs 6.6, P < 0.0001). Clinicians were less satisfied with telehealth than patients (7.1 vs 8.6, P = 0.02); however, most would be happy to continue using telehealth in non-pandemic times (7.0 (6.2-9.8)).

Conclusion: Telehealth consultations allow provision of gynaecological care at a time when reducing risk of infection to patients and staff is paramount. Telehealth gynaecology consultations are efficient and convenient without significant detriment to patient or clinician satisfaction.

Citing Articles

The Unintended Consequences of Telehealth in Australia: Critical Interpretive Synthesis.

Osman S, Churruca K, Ellis L, Luo D, Braithwaite J J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e57848.

PMID: 39190446 PMC: 11387926. DOI: 10.2196/57848.


Exploring physiotherapists' perceptions of telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders: Insights from focus groups.

Sia L, Sharma S, Kumar S, Singh D Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241248916.

PMID: 38665882 PMC: 11044802. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241248916.


Telehealth follow-up consultations for melanoma patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Patient and clinician satisfaction.

Al-Rikaby A, Sulaiman A, Thompson J, Saw R, Boyle F, Taylor N Cancer Med. 2023; 12(23):21373-21388.

PMID: 37930181 PMC: 10726917. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6679.


Gestational diabetes mellitus in the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective study from Hangzhou, China.

Yin B, Wu K, Hu L, Zheng W, Zheng Y, Duan X J Diabetes. 2022; 14(10):711-720.

PMID: 36181374 PMC: 9574731. DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.13324.

References
1.
Endler M, Lavelanet A, Cleeve A, Ganatra B, Gomperts R, Gemzell-Danielsson K . Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review. BJOG. 2019; 126(9):1094-1102. PMC: 7496179. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15684. View

2.
Jefferis H, Muriithi F, White B, Price N, Jackson S . Telephone follow-up after day case tension-free vaginal tape insertion. Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 27(5):787-90. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2891-6. View

3.
Asiri A, Albishi S, AlMadani W, ElMetwally A, Househ M . The Use of Telemedicine in Surgical Care: a Systematic Review. Acta Inform Med. 2018; 26(3):201-206. PMC: 6195401. DOI: 10.5455/aim.2018.26.201-206. View

4.
Stifani B, Avila K, Levi E . Telemedicine for contraceptive counseling: An exploratory survey of US family planning providers following rapid adoption of services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contraception. 2020; 103(3):157-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.11.006. View

5.
. Implementing Telehealth in Practice: ACOG Committee Opinion Summary, Number 798. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135(2):493-494. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003672. View