» Articles » PMID: 35322300

Does Increasing Estrogen Dose During Frozen Embryo Transfer Affect Pregnancy Rate?

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 Mar 24
PMID 35322300
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of increasing estrogen doses during hormone therapy frozen embryo transfer (HT-FET) cycles on endometrial thickness and success rates compared to patients who received fixed estrogen dose.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective study from a university-based fertility clinic during the years 2008-2021. We compared two groups: the fixed-dose group (i.e., received 6 mg estradiol dose daily until embryo transfer) and the increased-dose group (i.e., the initial estradiol dose was 6 mg daily, and was increased during the cycle).

Primary Outcome: clinical pregnancy rate.

Results: The study included 5452 cycles of HT-FET: 4774 cycles in the fixed-dose group and 678 cycles in the increased-dose group. Ultrasound scan on days 2-3 of the cycle showed endometrial thickness slightly different between the two groups (4.2 mm in the fixed-dose and 4.0 mm in the increased-dose group, P = 0.003). The total estrogen dose was higher, and the treatment duration was longer in the increased than the fixed-dose group (122 mg vs. 66 mg and 17 days vs. 11 days, respectively; P < 0.001). The last ultrasound scan done before the addition of progesterone showed that the endometrial thickness was significantly thicker in the fixed than the increased-dose group (9.5 mm vs. 8.3 mm; P < 0.001). The clinical pregnancy rates were 35.8% in the increased-group vs. 34.1% in the fixed-dose group; P = 0.401.

Conclusions: The increased-dose group had thinner endometrium despite the higher doses of estrogen and longer treatment duration than the fixed-dose group. However, the pregnancy rates were similar between the two groups.

Citing Articles

Preparation of the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer: an update on clinical practices.

Zhang Y, Fu X, Gao S, Gao S, Gao S, Ma J Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023; 21(1):52.

PMID: 37291605 PMC: 10249325. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-023-01106-5.

References
1.
Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y . Endometrial pattern, thickness and growth in predicting pregnancy outcome following 3319 IVF cycle. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 29(3):291-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.05.011. View

2.
Liu K, Hartman M, Hartman A, Luo Z, Mahutte N . The impact of a thin endometrial lining on fresh and frozen-thaw IVF outcomes: an analysis of over 40 000 embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33(10):1883-1888. PMC: 6145412. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey281. View

3.
Ghobara T, Gelbaya T, Ayeleke R . Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 7:CD003414. PMC: 6483463. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003414.pub3. View

4.
Wu H, Zhou P, Lin X, Wang S, Zhang S . Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021; 38(8):1913-1926. PMC: 8417182. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02125-0. View

5.
Cimadomo D, Soscia D, Vaiarelli A, Maggiulli R, Capalbo A, Ubaldi F . Looking past the appearance: a comprehensive description of the clinical contribution of poor-quality blastocysts to increase live birth rates during cycles with aneuploidy testing. Hum Reprod. 2019; 34(7):1206-1214. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez078. View