» Articles » PMID: 35321133

Pulmonary and Inspiratory Muscle Function Response to a Mountain Ultramarathon

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Mar 24
PMID 35321133
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The study aimed to provide within-race data on the time course of pulmonary function during a mountain ultramarathon (MUM). Additionally, we wanted to assess possible sex differences regarding pre- to post-race change in pulmonary and inspiratory muscle function. Lastly, we were interested in evaluating whether changes in respiratory function were associated with relative running speed and due to general or specific fatigue. 47 athletes (29 males and 18 females; 41 ± 5 years) were submitted to a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) before a 107-km MUM. Spirometric variables: forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV/FVC and peak expiratory flow (PEF); maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP); squat jump (SJ) and handgrip strength (HG) were assessed before and after the race. Additionally PEF was measured at three aid stations (33, 66 and 84 km) during the race. PEF declined from the 33 to the 66 km (p = 0.004; d = 0.72) and from the 84 km to the finish line (p = 0.003; d = 0.90), while relative running speed dropped from the first (0-33 km) to the second (33-66 km) race section (p < 0.001; d = 1.81) and from the third (66-84 km) to the last race section (p < 0.001; d = 1.61). Post-race, a moderate reduction was noted in FVC (-13%; p < 0.001; d = 0.52), FEV (-19.5%; p < 0.001; d = 0.65), FEV/FVC (-8.4%; p = 0.030; d = 0.59), PEF (-20.3%; p < 0.001; d = 0.58), MIP (-25.3%; p < 0.001; d = 0.79) and SJ (-31.6%; p < 0.001; d = 1.42). Conversely, HG did not change from pre- to post-race (-1.4%; p = 0.56; d = 0.05). PEF declined during the race in parallel with running speed drop. No sex differences were noted regarding post-race respiratory function, except that FEV/FVC decay was significantly greater among women. The magnitude of pre- to post-race respiratory function decline was uncorrelated with relative running speed.

Citing Articles

Functional assessment of respiratory muscles and lung capacity of CrossFit athletes.

Fabrin S, Palinkas M, Fioco E, Gomes G, Regueiro E, da Silva G J Exerc Rehabil. 2023; 19(1):67-74.

PMID: 36910685 PMC: 9993009. DOI: 10.12965/jer.2244594.297.


Is There Evidence for the Development of Sex-Specific Guidelines for Ultramarathon Coaches and Athletes? A Systematic Review.

Kelly C Sports Med Open. 2023; 9(1):6.

PMID: 36695958 PMC: 9877268. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-022-00533-9.

References
1.
Bernardi E, Pratali L, Mandolesi G, Spiridonova M, Roi G, Cogo A . Thoraco-abdominal coordination and performance during uphill running at altitude. PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0174927. PMC: 5376328. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174927. View

2.
Martinez-Navarro I, Sanchez-Gomez J, Aparicio I, Priego-Quesada J, Perez-Soriano P, Collado E . Effect of mountain ultramarathon distance competition on biochemical variables, respiratory and lower-limb fatigue. PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0238846. PMC: 7485829. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238846. View

3.
Easthope C, Hausswirth C, Louis J, Lepers R, Vercruyssen F, Brisswalter J . Effects of a trail running competition on muscular performance and efficiency in well-trained young and master athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010; 110(6):1107-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1597-1. View

4.
Ker J, Schultz C . Respiratory muscle fatigue after an ultra-marathon measured as inspiratory task failure. Int J Sports Med. 1996; 17(7):493-6. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-972884. View

5.
Fornasiero A, Savoldelli A, Fruet D, Boccia G, Pellegrini B, Schena F . Physiological intensity profile, exercise load and performance predictors of a 65-km mountain ultra-marathon. J Sports Sci. 2017; 36(11):1287-1295. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1374707. View