Epidemiological Relevance of Elevated Preoperative Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scores on Clinical Improvement Following Lumbar Decompression

Overview

Journal Int J Spine Surg

Date 2022 Mar 22

PMID 35314511

Authors

James M Parrish

Nathaniel W Jenkins

Elliot D K Cha

Conor P Lynch

Cara E Geoghegan

Caroline N Jadczak

Shruthi Mohan

Kern Singh

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Limited research exists regarding the influence of preoperative depression on postoperative mental health, physical function, and pain in lumbar decompression (LD) patients. This study aims to evaluate the association of depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) with other mental health and physical function clinical outcomes among patients undergoing LD.

Methods: A prospectively maintained surgical registry was reviewed for primary LD from March 2016 to May 2019. Patients were stratified into 3 preoperative PHQ-9 score subgroups. Higher PHQ-9 scores indicated greater depressive symptoms. We assessed demographic and perioperative characteristics among subgroups with appropriate statistical testing. We also evaluated outcome instruments and postoperative improvement for the following outcomes: PHQ-9, Short Form 12 (SF-12), Veterans RAND 12-Item (VR-12), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), visual analog scale (VAS) leg, and VAS back.

Results: The 351-subject cohort was 70.4% men with an average age of 47 years; 186 subjects had minimal preoperative depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 <5), 94 had moderate (5≤ PHQ-9 ≤10), and 71 had severe (PHQ-9 >10). Subgroups with more severe symptoms of depression had worse mental health outcome scores (PHQ-9, 12-Mental Health Composite Score [12-MCS], and VR-12-MCS) and a positive linear association with greater pre- to postoperative mental health improvements at all timepoints. Subgroups with more severe symptoms of depression had worse PROMIS-PF scores at all timepoints, though VAS pain scores had no depression symptom association by 1 year.

Conclusion: Patients with more severe preoperative depressive symptoms, as evaluated by PHQ-9, have a greater improvement in PHQ-9, SF-12, and VR-12 scores, but more severe PHQ-9 scores are associated with worse overall physical function scores. This study demonstrates the relevance of preoperative depressive symptoms and their necessity in future risk factor models.

Level Of Evidence: 3:

Clinical Relevance: Severity of preoperative PHQ-9 acts as a significant risk factor to postoperative pain and mental and physical health improvement.

Citing Articles

Anxiety and depression in people with post-COVID condition: a Belgian population-based cohort study three months after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

DHondt S, Gisle L, De Pauw R, Van Cauteren D, Demarest S, Drieskens S Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024; 59(11):2083-2092.

PMID: 38819519 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-024-02655-9.

Post-Operative Physical Therapy Following Cervical Spine Surgery: Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Lorentz N, Galetta M, Zabat M, Raman T, Protopsaltis T, Fischer C Cureus. 2023; 15(6):e40559.

PMID: 37465791 PMC: 10351333. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40559.

References

Chung A, DiGiovanni R, Tseng S, Hustedt J, Chutkan N . Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Elective Spine Surgery: National Prevalence and Inpatient Outcomes. Global Spine J. 2018; 8(6):550-556. PMC: 6125927. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217740898. View

Engel-Yeger B, Keren A, Berkovich Y, Sarfaty E, Merom L . The role of physical status versus mental status in predicting the quality of life of patients with lumbar disk herniation. Disabil Rehabil. 2016; 40(3):302-308. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1253114. View

Anderson R, Freedland K, Clouse R, Lustman P . The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24(6):1069-78. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.6.1069. View

Patel D, Yoo J, Khechen B, Haws B, Block A, Lamoutte E . PHQ-9 Score Predicts Postoperative Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2019; 32(10):444-448. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000818. View

Asher R, Mason A, Weiner J, Fessler R . The relationship between preoperative general mental health and postoperative quality of life in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery. Neurosurgery. 2015; 76(6):672-9. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000695. View

Broda A, Sanford Z, Turcotte J, Patton C . Development of a Risk Prediction Model With Improved Clinical Utility in Elective Cervical and Lumbar Spine Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 45(9):E542-E551. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003317. View

Wiltink J, Michal M, Wild P, Zwiener I, Blettner M, Munzel T . Associations between depression and different measures of obesity (BMI, WC, WHtR, WHR). BMC Psychiatry. 2013; 13:223. PMC: 3849983. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-223. View

McMillan M, Allegrini V, Asbun H, Ball C, Bassi C, Beane J . Incorporation of Procedure-specific Risk Into the ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator Improves the Prediction of Morbidity and Mortality After Pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2016; 265(5):978-986. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001796. View

Sullivan M, Reesor K, Mikail S, Fisher R . The treatment of depression in chronic low back pain: review and recommendations. Pain. 1992; 50(1):5-13. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90107-M. View

10.

Passias P, Vasquez-Montes D, Poorman G, Protopsaltis T, Horn S, Bortz C . Predictive model for distal junctional kyphosis after cervical deformity surgery. Spine J. 2018; 18(12):2187-2194. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.017. View

11.

Donnarumma P, Tarantino R, Nigro L, Rullo M, Messina D, Diacinti D . Decompression versus decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar stenosis: analysis of the factors influencing the outcome of back pain and disability. J Spine Surg. 2016; 2(1):52-8. PMC: 5039834. DOI: 10.21037/jss.2016.03.07. View

12.

Strom J, Bjerrum M, Nielsen C, Thisted C, Nielsen T, Laursen M . Anxiety and depression in spine surgery-a systematic integrative review. Spine J. 2018; 18(7):1272-1285. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.017. View

13.

Veeravagu A, Li A, Swinney C, Tian L, Moraff A, Azad T . Predicting complication risk in spine surgery: a prospective analysis of a novel risk assessment tool. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017; 27(1):81-91. DOI: 10.3171/2016.12.SPINE16969. View

14.

Tuomainen I, Pakarinen M, Aalto T, Sinikallio S, Kroger H, Viinamaki H . Depression is associated with the long-term outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a 10-year follow-up study. Spine J. 2017; 18(3):458-463. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.228. View

15.

Crawford 3rd C, Glassman S, Mummaneni P, Knightly J, Asher A . Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016; 25(5):596-601. DOI: 10.3171/2016.3.SPINE151468. View

16.

Fisahn C, Schmidt C, Schroeder J, Vialle E, Lieberman I, Dettori J . Blood Transfusion and Postoperative Infection in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review. Global Spine J. 2018; 8(2):198-207. PMC: 5898681. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217747572. View

17.

Urban-Baeza A, Zarate-Kalfopulos B, Romero-Vargas S, Obil-Chavarria C, Brenes-Rojas L, Reyes-Sanchez A . Influence of depression symptoms on patient expectations and clinical outcomes in the surgical management of spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014; 22(1):75-9. DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131106. View

18.

Villarroel M, Terlizzi E . Symptoms of Depression Among Adults: United States, 2019. NCHS Data Brief. 2020; (379):1-8. View

19.

Manea L, Gilbody S, McMillan D . A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014; 37(1):67-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.09.009. View

20.

Baranek E, Maier 2nd S, Matsumoto H, Hyman J, Vitale M, Roye Jr D . Gross Motor Function Classification System Specific Growth Charts-Utility as a Risk Stratification Tool for Surgical Site Infection Following Spine Surgery. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019; 39(4):e298-e302. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001285. View