» Articles » PMID: 35311508

Genome-Wide Assessment of Stress-Associated Genes in Bifidobacteria

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over the last decade, the genomes of several strains have been sequenced, delivering valuable insights into their genetic makeup. However, bifidobacterial genomes have not yet been systematically mined for genes associated with stress response functions and their regulation. In this work, a list of 76 genes related to stress response in bifidobacteria was compiled from previous studies. The prevalence of the genes was evaluated among the genome sequences of 171 strains. Although genes of the protein quality control and DNA repair systems appeared to be highly conserved, genome-wide screening for consensus sequences of putative regulators suggested that the regulation of these systems differs among phylogenetic groups. Homologs of multiple oxidative stress-associated genes are shared across species, albeit at low sequence similarity. Bee isolates were confirmed to harbor unique genetic features linked to oxygen tolerance. Moreover, most studied Bifidobacterium adolescentis and all Bifidobacterium angulatum strains lacked a set of reactive oxygen species-detoxifying enzymes, which might explain their high sensitivity to oxygen. Furthermore, the presence of some putative transcriptional regulators of stress responses was found to vary across species and strains, indicating that different regulation strategies of stress-associated gene transcription contribute to the diverse stress tolerance. The presented stress response gene profiles of strains provide a valuable knowledge base for guiding future studies by enabling hypothesis generation and the identification of key genes for further analyses. Bifidobacteria are Gram-positive bacteria that naturally inhabit diverse ecological niches, including the gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals. Strains of the genus are widely used as probiotics, since they have been associated with health benefits. In the course of their production and administration, probiotic bifidobacteria are exposed to several stressors that can challenge their survival. The stress tolerance of probiotic bifidobacteria is, therefore, an important selection criterion for their commercial application, since strains must maintain their viability to exert their beneficial health effects. As the ability to cope with stressors varies among strains, comprehensive understanding of the underlying stress physiology is required for enabling knowledge-driven strain selection and optimization of industrial-scale production processes.

Citing Articles

Unlocking Probiotic Potential: Genomic Insights into Weissella paramesenteroides UFTM 2.6.1.

Rocha B, Sabino Y, Costa de Almeida T, Palacio F, Rotta I, Dias V Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2024; .

PMID: 39633035 DOI: 10.1007/s12602-024-10409-x.


The influence of the gut-brain axis on anxiety and depression: A review of the literature on the use of probiotics.

Ferrari S, Mule S, Parini F, Galla R, Ruga S, Rosso G J Tradit Complement Med. 2024; 14(3):237-255.

PMID: 38707924 PMC: 11069002. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2024.03.011.


species viability in dairy-based probiotic foods: challenges and innovative approaches for accurate viability determination and monitoring of probiotic functionality.

Sibanda T, Marole T, Thomashoff U, Thantsha M, Buys E Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1327010.

PMID: 38371928 PMC: 10869629. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1327010.


Exploring species community and functional variations with human gut microbiome structure and health beyond infancy.

Ladeira R, Tap J, Derrien M Microbiome Res Rep. 2023; 2(2):9.

PMID: 38047280 PMC: 10688807. DOI: 10.20517/mrr.2023.01.


Novel Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Robustness and Stability in Probiotic Bifidobacteria.

Schopping M, Goel A, Jensen K, Faria R, Franzen C, Zeidan A Appl Environ Microbiol. 2023; 89(3):e0008223.

PMID: 36802222 PMC: 10057886. DOI: 10.1128/aem.00082-23.


References
1.
Ruiz L, Gueimonde M, Ruas-Madiedo P, Ribbera A, de Los Reyes-Gavilan C, Ventura M . Molecular clues to understand the aerotolerance phenotype of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 78(3):644-50. PMC: 3264121. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.05455-11. View

2.
Bottacini F, Milani C, Turroni F, Sanchez B, Foroni E, Duranti S . Bifidobacterium asteroides PRL2011 genome analysis reveals clues for colonization of the insect gut. PLoS One. 2012; 7(9):e44229. PMC: 3447821. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044229. View

3.
Sun Z, Zhang W, Guo C, Yang X, Liu W, Wu Y . Comparative genomic analysis of 45 type strains of the genus Bifidobacterium: a snapshot of its genetic diversity and evolution. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2):e0117912. PMC: 4319941. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117912. View

4.
Rosberg-Cody E, Liavonchanka A, Gobel C, Ross R, OSullivan O, Fitzgerald G . Myosin-cross-reactive antigen (MCRA) protein from Bifidobacterium breve is a FAD-dependent fatty acid hydratase which has a function in stress protection. BMC Biochem. 2011; 12:9. PMC: 3063827. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2091-12-9. View

5.
Tanaka K, Satoh T, Kitahara J, Uno S, Nomura I, Kano Y . O-inducible HO-forming NADPH oxidase is responsible for the hyper O sensitivity of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):10750. PMC: 6048055. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29030-4. View