» Articles » PMID: 35311142

An Ultrasonic-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Solid Renal Masses

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Mar 21
PMID 35311142
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted in order to develop and validate an ultrasonic-based radiomics nomogram for diagnosing solid renal masses.

Methods: Six hundred renal solid masses with benign renal lesions ( = 204) and malignant renal tumors ( = 396) were divided into a training set ( = 480) and a validation set ( = 120). Radiomics features were extracted from ultrasound (US) images preoperatively and then a radiomics score (RadScore) was calculated. By integrating the RadScore and independent clinical factors, a radiomics nomogram was constructed. The diagnostic performance of junior physician, senior physician, RadScore, and radiomics nomogram in identifying benign from malignant solid renal masses was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) in both the training and validation sets. The clinical usefulness of the nomogram was assessed using decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: The radiomics signature model showed satisfactory discrimination in the training set [area under the ROC (AUC), 0.887; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.860-0.915] and the validation set (AUC, 0.874; 95% CI, 0.816-0.932). The radiomics nomogram also demonstrated good calibration and discrimination in the training set (AUC, 0.911; 95% CI, 0.886-0.936) and the validation set (AUC, 0.861; 95% CI, 0.802-0.921). In addition, the radiomics nomogram model showed higher accuracy in discriminating benign and malignant renal masses compared with the evaluations by junior physician (DeLong = 0.004), and the model also showed significantly higher specificity than the senior and junior physicians (0.93 vs. 0.57 vs. 0.46).

Conclusions: The ultrasonic-based radiomics nomogram shows favorable predictive efficacy in differentiating solid renal masses.

Citing Articles

A narrative review on the application of artificial intelligence in renal ultrasound.

Xu T, Zhang X, Yang N, Jiang F, Chen G, Pan X Front Oncol. 2024; 13:1252630.

PMID: 38495082 PMC: 10943690. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1252630.


A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of benign and malignant small renal masses (≤4 cm).

Feng S, Gong M, Zhou D, Yuan R, Kong J, Jiang F Transl Oncol. 2023; 29:101627.

PMID: 36731307 PMC: 9937807. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101627.


Radiomics and Its Applications and Progress in Pancreatitis: A Current State of the Art Review.

Yan G, Yan G, Li H, Liang H, Peng C, Bhetuwal A Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:922299.

PMID: 35814756 PMC: 9259974. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.922299.

References
1.
Nie P, Yang G, Wang Z, Yan L, Miao W, Hao D . A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat from homogeneous clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2019; 30(2):1274-1284. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06427-x. View

2.
Hodgdon T, McInnes M, Schieda N, Flood T, Lamb L, Thornhill R . Can Quantitative CT Texture Analysis be Used to Differentiate Fat-poor Renal Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma on Unenhanced CT Images?. Radiology. 2015; 276(3):787-96. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142215. View

3.
Campbell S, Novick A, Belldegrun A, Blute M, Chow G, Derweesh I . Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol. 2009; 182(4):1271-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.004. View

4.
Siegel C, Middleton W, Teefey S, McClennan B . Angiomyolipoma and renal cell carcinoma: US differentiation. Radiology. 1996; 198(3):789-93. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.198.3.8628873. View

5.
Kutikov A, Fossett L, Ramchandani P, Tomaszewski J, Siegelman E, Banner M . Incidence of benign pathologic findings at partial nephrectomy for solitary renal mass presumed to be renal cell carcinoma on preoperative imaging. Urology. 2006; 68(4):737-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.04.011. View