Comparing Older and Younger Adults Perceptions of Voice and Text-based Search for Consumer Health Information Tasks

Overview

Journal AMIA Annu Symp Proc

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2022 Mar 21

PMID 35309005

Authors

Karen Bonilla

Brian Gaitan

Jamie Sanders

Noami Khenglawt

Aqueasha Martin-Hammond

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The increased prevalence of voice search presents opportunities to address consumer challenges accessing online health information. However, it is essential to understand how users' perceptions of voice affect their search processes for health information, concerns, and different scenarios for using voice for health information tasks. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 younger (18-25) and older (60-64) adult participants to understand and compare their perceptions of using voice and text-based search for non-health-related and health-related tasks. While most participants preferred traditional text search, younger adults were not inclined to use voice search for health information due to concerns about privacy, credibility, and perceived efficiency in filtering results. Older adults found voice search potentially beneficial for reducing manual query generation burdens; however, some were unsure of how to use the technology effectively. We provide a set of considerations to address concerns about voice search for health information tasks in the future.

References

Medlock S, Eslami S, Askari M, Arts D, Sent D, de Rooij S . Health information-seeking behavior of seniors who use the Internet: a survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(1):e10. PMC: 4296102. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3749. View

Martin-Hammond A, Vemireddy S, Rao K . Exploring Older Adults' Beliefs About the Use of Intelligent Assistants for Consumer Health Information Management: A Participatory Design Study. JMIR Aging. 2019; 2(2):e15381. PMC: 6931054. DOI: 10.2196/15381. View

Waterworth S, Honey M . On-line health seeking activity of older adults: an integrative review of the literature. Geriatr Nurs. 2017; 39(3):310-317. DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.10.016. View

Estacio E, Whittle R, Protheroe J . The digital divide: Examining socio-demographic factors associated with health literacy, access and use of internet to seek health information. J Health Psychol. 2017; 24(12):1668-1675. DOI: 10.1177/1359105317695429. View

Choi N, DiNitto D . The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(5):e93. PMC: 3650931. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2645. View

McAuley A . Digital health interventions: widening access or widening inequalities?. Public Health. 2014; 128(12):1118-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.10.008. View

Nallam P, Bhandari S, Sanders J, Martin-Hammond A . A Question of Access: Exploring the Perceived Benefits and Barriers of Intelligent Voice Assistants for Improving Access to Consumer Health Resources Among Low-Income Older Adults. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021; 6:2333721420985975. PMC: 7783870. DOI: 10.1177/2333721420985975. View

Hoy M . Alexa, Siri, Cortana, and More: An Introduction to Voice Assistants. Med Ref Serv Q. 2018; 37(1):81-88. DOI: 10.1080/02763869.2018.1404391. View

McCloud R, Okechukwu C, Sorensen G, Viswanath K . Beyond access: barriers to internet health information seeking among the urban poor. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016; 23(6):1053-1059. PMC: 5070515. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv204. View

10.

Fink A, Beck J . Developing and Evaluating a Website to Guide Older Adults in Their Health Information Searches: A Mixed-Methods Approach. J Appl Gerontol. 2014; 34(5):633-51. DOI: 10.1177/0733464813486961. View

11.

Kim S . Exploring How Older Adults Use a Smart Speaker-Based Voice Assistant in Their First Interactions: Qualitative Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021; 9(1):e20427. PMC: 7840274. DOI: 10.2196/20427. View

12.

Xie B . Improving older adults' e-health literacy through computer training using NIH online resources. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2012; 34(1):63-71. PMC: 3358785. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2011.07.006. View

13.

Kumah-Crystal Y, Pirtle C, Whyte H, Goode E, Anders S, Lehmann C . Electronic Health Record Interactions through Voice: A Review. Appl Clin Inform. 2018; 9(3):541-552. PMC: 6051768. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1666844. View

14.

Bickmore T, Trinh H, Olafsson S, OLeary T, Asadi R, Rickles N . Patient and Consumer Safety Risks When Using Conversational Assistants for Medical Information: An Observational Study of Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(9):e11510. PMC: 6231817. DOI: 10.2196/11510. View

15.

OBrien K, Liggett A, Ramirez-Zohfeld V, Sunkara P, Lindquist L . Voice-Controlled Intelligent Personal Assistants to Support Aging in Place. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019; 68(1):176-179. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16217. View

16.

Sezgin E, Huang Y, Ramtekkar U, Lin S . Readiness for voice assistants to support healthcare delivery during a health crisis and pandemic. NPJ Digit Med. 2020; 3:122. PMC: 7494948. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-020-00332-0. View

17.

Azevedo R, Morrow D, Graumlich J, Willemsen-Dunlap A, Hasegawa-Johnson M, Huang T . Using conversational agents to explain medication instructions to older adults. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2019; 2018:185-194. PMC: 6371340. View

18.

Alagha E, Helbing R . Evaluating the quality of voice assistants' responses to consumer health questions about vaccines: an exploratory comparison of Alexa, Google Assistant and Siri. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019; 26(1). PMC: 10410977. DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100075. View

19.

Lee S, Lin J . The Influence of Offline and Online Intrinsic Motivations on Online Health Information Seeking. Health Commun. 2019; 35(9):1129-1136. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1620088. View

20.

Laranjo L, Dunn A, Tong H, Kocaballi A, Chen J, Bashir R . Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018; 25(9):1248-1258. PMC: 6118869. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocy072. View