» Articles » PMID: 35306633

The Economic Burden of Insulin Injection-Induced Lipohypertophy. Role of Education: The ISTERP-3 Study

Abstract

Introduction: The history of insulin-induced skin lipohypertrophy (LH) runs parallel to that of insulin's 100 years, and an average of 47% of insulin-treated patients still suffer from it today. The metabolic and economic effects of LH are significant, with hypoglycemia being the most striking. The objective of the study was to perform a 52-week follow-up of 713 insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and LH to detect any differences in the occurrence of hypoglycemic events (HYPOs) and related healthcare costs as well as in LH rates and injection habits between an intensive education intervention group (IG) and control group (CG) provided with a single educational session at the starting point.

Methods: All participants were trained in accurately self-monitoring blood glucose and recording all HYPOs for 6 months, which allowed baseline recordings before they were randomized into the IG, comprising 395 insulin-treated subjects undergoing repeated, structured multimodal education on correct injection techniques as a longstanding behavioral rehabilitation strategy, and the CG, comprising 318 subjects receiving the same structured, multimodal educational session, but only initially.

Results: Changes in LH rate and size and in performance were large in the IG and only slight and transient in the CG. A striking difference in the rate of decrease of HYPOs was also apparent between groups. Indeed, estimated costs of health interventions for severe and symptomatic HYPOs, which were on the order of €70,000 and €9300, respectively, in the two groups at baseline decreased by 5.9 times and 13.7 times, respectively, at the end of follow-up in the IG and by only approximately half in the CG. Full details of the changes occurring as a result of intensive education are provided in the text.

Conclusions: The effect of only initial education in the CG was not significant, thus providing evidence of the virtual worthlessness of a single training session on injection techniques, typical of worldwide daily clinical practice, and easily explaining the extremely high prevalence of LH in insulin-treated patients. Conversely, highly positive effects on LH prevalence and size as well as costs expected from decreased HYPO rate were obtained in the IG. To our knowledge, ours is the first 18-month randomized trial in the field. If our experimental model were to be used as an effective, longstanding behavioral rehabilitation strategy and therefore adapted to real-world settings universally, LH prevalence and costs related to their clinical consequences would be drastically reduced. However, only with a strong, relentless commitment of universities, scientific societies, and patient associations can we achieve this ambitious goal, which would provide great institutional savings and improved quality of life for people with diabetes.

Citing Articles

Health-Economic Modelling of Improved Behavior in Insulin Injection Technique in Belgium.

Theys K, Vermander S, Annemans L, De Block C, Hermans M, Matthys I Pharmacoecon Open. 2024; 9(2):259-270.

PMID: 39674967 PMC: 11865415. DOI: 10.1007/s41669-024-00547-x.


Expert Opinion on Addressing the Gap in Injection Technique and Needle Reuse for People with Diabetes in Indonesia.

Soewondo P, Suastika K, Kshanti I, Mardianto M, Mudjanarko S, Pramono R Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023; 16:4101-4107.

PMID: 38111730 PMC: 10725793. DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S433254.


Lipohypertrophy and Insulin: An Update From the Diabetes Technology Society.

Tian T, Aaron R, Huang J, Yeung A, Svensson J, Gentile S J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023; 17(6):1711-1721.

PMID: 37555266 PMC: 10658672. DOI: 10.1177/19322968231187661.


Assessing Barriers and Adherence to Insulin Injection Technique in People With Diabetes: Development and Validation of New Assessment Tools.

Ehrmann D, Kulzer B, Wienbarg I, Sieber J, Weber S, Haak T J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023; 18(6):1362-1369.

PMID: 37209023 PMC: 11529062. DOI: 10.1177/19322968231175920.

References
1.
Hsu P, Sung S, Cheng H, Yeh J, Liu W, Chan W . Association of clinical symptomatic hypoglycemia with cardiovascular events and total mortality in type 2 diabetes: a nationwide population-based study. Diabetes Care. 2012; 36(4):894-900. PMC: 3609481. DOI: 10.2337/dc12-0916. View

2.
Hirsch L, Strauss K . The Injection Technique Factor: What You Don't Know or Teach Can Make a Difference. Clin Diabetes. 2019; 37(3):227-233. PMC: 6640874. DOI: 10.2337/cd18-0076. View

3.
Smith M, Clapham L, Strauss K . UK lipohypertrophy interventional study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017; 126:248-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.01.020. View

4.
Gentile S, Strollo F . Cost saving effects of a short-term educational intervention entailing lower hypoglycaemic event rates in people with type 1 diabetes and lipo-hypertrophy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018; 143:320-321. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.07.030. View

5.
Gentile S, Guarino G, Della Corte T, Marino G, Satta E, Pasquarella M . The Durability of an Intensive, Structured Education-Based Rehabilitation Protocol for Best Insulin Injection Practice: The ISTERP-2 Study. Diabetes Ther. 2021; 12(9):2557-2569. PMC: 8385007. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-021-01108-9. View