» Articles » PMID: 35305795

Overwhelming Support for Sexual Health Education in U.S. Schools: A Meta-Analysis of 23 Surveys Conducted Between 2000 and 2016

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2022 Mar 20
PMID 35305795
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Surveys suggest that the general public (i.e., adults or parents) supports sexual health education in schools. However, the number of schools providing sex education continues to decline in the United States. The purpose of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis of U.S.-based representative surveys to provide a pooled estimate of public support for sexual health education delivered in schools.

Methods: A systematic search of three databases (Medline, PsycInfo, and ERIC) was conducted to identify survey measuring adult and parent attitudes toward sexual health education in school between 2000 and 2016. Meta-analyses were conducted in OpenMetaAnalyst via the metaphor package in R using a DerSimonian-Laird random effect models to account for heterogeneity between surveys.

Results: A total of 23 citations met study inclusion and exclusion criteria, representing 15 unique probability surveys conducted with the public. Among the included surveys, 14 were nationwide and 11 included parents or an overrepresentation of parents. Across all survey findings, 88.7% (95% confidence interval = 86.2-91.2) of respondents supported sexual health education. Among surveys that only included parents or oversampled for parents, 90.0% (95% confidence interval = 86.5-93.4) supported sexual health education, and among nationally representative surveys, 87.7% (95% confidence interval = 85.1-90.6) of respondents supported sexual health education.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate overwhelming support for sexual health education delivered in schools. Additional research is needed to determine individual differences in support for specific sexual health education topics and skills delivered through classroom-based instruction.

References
1.
DerSimonian R, Laird N . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7(3):177-88. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. View

2.
Lloyd S, Ferguson Y, Corbie-Smith G, Ellison A, Blumenthal C, Council B . The role of public schools in HIV prevention: perspectives from African Americans in the rural South. AIDS Educ Prev. 2012; 24(1):41-53. PMC: 3378321. DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2012.24.1.41. View

3.
Landry D, Darroch J, Singh S, Higgins J . Factors associated with the content of sex education in U.S. public secondary schools. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004; 35(6):261-9. DOI: 10.1363/psrh.35.261.03. View

4.
Kantor L, Levitz N . Parents' views on sex education in schools: How much do Democrats and Republicans agree?. PLoS One. 2017; 12(7):e0180250. PMC: 5495344. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180250. View

5.
Saul Butler R, Sorace D, Hentz Beach K . Institutionalizing Sex Education in Diverse U.S. School Districts. J Adolesc Health. 2017; 62(2):149-156. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.025. View