Why Does Mode of Conception Affect Early Breastfeeding Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2022 Mar 18

PMID 35303044

Authors

Shiue-Shan Weng

Li-Yin Chien

Yi-Ting Huang

Yen-Tsung Huang

Min Chang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: It is uncertain whether Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) is associated with an increased risk of poor breastfeeding outcomes and what could be possible mechanisms. This study aimed to examine the effect of mode of conception on breastfeeding outcomes during the first two months postpartum and identify the potential mediating pathways for this relationship.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a sample of 3,565 women with live births. Participants were classified by mode of conception as follows: fertile women who conceived naturally (fertile women; n = 2,857), women with infertility who conceived naturally (sub-fertile women; n = 483), and women with infertility who conceived through ART (women with infertility; n = 310). The infant-feeding patterns were assessed with four-time points before two months postpartum. Binary and multinomial logistic regression and causal mediation analyses were performed.

Results: The rates of breastfeeding initiation and discontinuation across modes of conception were similar. However, infertile and sub-fertile women had 37% (95% CI 1.02, 1.83) and 56% (95% CI 1.06, 2.27) increased risks of introducing formula before the first week postpartum, respectively, and 35% (95% CI 1.01, 1.82) and 52% (95% CI 1.04, 2.24) higher risks of exclusive breastfeeding for less than one week, respectively, compared to fertile women. The relationships were mainly mediated through multiple gestation and admission to neonatal/pediatric intensive care units (NICU/PICU; proportions of mediation were over 50%). The effects of mode of conception on breastfeeding outcomes became not significant in cases of singleton birth.

Conclusions: Sub-fertile women and women with infertility intended to breastfeed but experienced higher perinatal risks in the early postpartum period. Multiple gestation and admission to NICU/PICU forced them to introduce formula earlier than preferred, thus leading to a shorter duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Single embryo transfer policy and breastfeeding support in NICU/PICU could help those women achieve positive early breastfeeding outcomes.

Citing Articles

Exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months after assisted and spontaneous conceiving: a prospective study in Northern Italy.

Pisoni C, Garofoli F, De Silvestri A, Civardi E, Ghirardello S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):6428.

PMID: 37081109 PMC: 10119084. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33688-w.

References

Cromi A, Serati M, Candeloro I, Uccella S, Scandroglio S, Agosti M . Assisted reproductive technology and breastfeeding outcomes: a case-control study. Fertil Steril. 2014; 103(1):89-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.009. View

. Multiple gestation pregnancy. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(8):1856-64. View

Jackson R, Gibson K, Wu Y, Croughan M . Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103(3):551-63. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000114989.84822.51. View

Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A . Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18(5):485-503. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dms018. View

Jakobsen J, Gluud C, Wetterslev J, Winkel P . When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials - a practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017; 17(1):162. PMC: 5717805. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1. View

Fauser B, Devroey P, Macklon N . Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment. Lancet. 2005; 365(9473):1807-16. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66478-1. View

Sunderam S, Kissin D, Flowers L, Anderson J, Folger S, Jamieson D . Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012; 61(7):1-23. View

VanderWeele T, Ding P . Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value. Ann Intern Med. 2017; 167(4):268-274. DOI: 10.7326/M16-2607. View

Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, Wang H, Gao S . Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2015; 105(1):73-85.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.007. View

10.

Hammarberg K, Fisher J, Wynter K, Rowe H . Breastfeeding after assisted conception: a prospective cohort study. Acta Paediatr. 2010; 100(4):529-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.02095.x. View

11.

Shih S, Huang Y, Yang H . A multiple mediator analysis approach to quantify the effects of the ADH1B and ALDH2 genes on hepatocellular carcinoma risk. Genet Epidemiol. 2018; 42(4):394-404. PMC: 5980724. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22120. View

12.

Fisher J, Hammarberg K, Wynter K, McBain J, Gibson F, Boivin J . Assisted conception, maternal age and breastfeeding: an Australian cohort study. Acta Paediatr. 2013; 102(10):970-6. DOI: 10.1111/apa.12336. View

13.

Valeri L, VanderWeele T . Mediation analysis allowing for exposure-mediator interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psychol Methods. 2013; 18(2):137-50. PMC: 3659198. DOI: 10.1037/a0031034. View

14.

Harrison W, Goodman D . Epidemiologic Trends in Neonatal Intensive Care, 2007-2012. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169(9):855-62. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1305. View

15.

Britton C, McCormick F, Renfrew M, Wade A, King S . Support for breastfeeding mothers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (1):CD001141. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub3. View

16.

Liu P, Qiao L, Xu F, Zhang M, Wang Y, Binns C . Factors associated with breastfeeding duration: a 30-month cohort study in northwest China. J Hum Lact. 2013; 29(2):253-9. DOI: 10.1177/0890334413477240. View

17.

Hoddinott P, Tappin D, Wright C . Breast feeding. BMJ. 2008; 336(7649):881-7. PMC: 2323059. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39521.566296.BE. View

18.

Bardis N, Maruthini D, Balen A . Modes of conception and multiple pregnancy: a national survey of babies born during one week in 2003 in the United Kingdom. Fertil Steril. 2005; 84(6):1727-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.052. View

19.

Textor J, Hardt J, Knuppel S . DAGitty: a graphical tool for analyzing causal diagrams. Epidemiology. 2011; 22(5):745. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318225c2be. View

20.

Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson G, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K . International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. 2009; 92(5):1520-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009. View