» Articles » PMID: 35303001

Intravenous Antibiotics at the Index Emergency Department Visit As an Independent Risk Factor for Hospital Admission at the Return Visit Within 72 Hours

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Mar 18
PMID 35303001
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Although infection was the most common symptom in patients returning to the ED, whether intravenous antibiotic administration at the index visit could serve as an indicator of patients with infectious diseases at high risk for hospital admission after returning to the ED within a short period of time remains unclear. The study aimed to investigate the potential risk factors for hospital admission in patients returning to the ED within 72 hours with a final diagnosis of infectious diseases.

Material And Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed return visits to the ED from January to December 2019. Adult patients aged >20 years who had a return visit to the ED within 72 hours with an infectious disease were included herein. In total, 715 eligible patients were classified into the intravenous antibiotics and non-intravenous antibiotics group (reference group). The outcome studied was hospital admission to general ward and intensive care unit (ICU) at the return visits.

Results: Patients receiving intravenous antibiotics at index visits had significantly higher risk-approximately two times-for hospital admission at the return visits than those did not (adjusted odds ratio = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.34-4.57, p = 0.004). For every 10 years increase in age, the likelihood for hospital admission increased by 38%. Other factors included abnormal respiratory rate and high C-reactive protein levels.

Conclusions: Intravenous antibiotic administration at the index visit was an independent risk factor for hospital admission at return visits in patients with an infection disease. Physicians should consider carefully before discharging patients receiving intravenous antibiotics.

Citing Articles

Chief complaints and computed tomography results in the emergency department: a three-year retrospective cohort study.

Fan C, Chen C, Chen J, Chang J, Huang E, Sung C BMC Emerg Med. 2024; 24(1):87.

PMID: 38764022 PMC: 11103846. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-01003-z.

References
1.
Kim D, Park Y, Park J, Brown N, Chu K, Lee J . Influence of Overcrowding in the Emergency Department on Return Visit within 72 Hours. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(5). PMC: 7290478. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051406. View

2.
Pham J, Kirsch T, Hill P, DeRuggerio K, Hoffmann B . Seventy-two-hour returns may not be a good indicator of safety in the emergency department: a national study. Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18(4):390-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01042.x. View

3.
Jorgensen S, Zurayk M, Yeung S, Terry J, Dunn M, Nieberg P . Risk factors for early return visits to the emergency department in patients with urinary tract infection. Am J Emerg Med. 2017; 36(1):12-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.041. View

4.
Sproston N, Ashworth J . Role of C-Reactive Protein at Sites of Inflammation and Infection. Front Immunol. 2018; 9:754. PMC: 5908901. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00754. View

5.
Fan J, Kao W, Yen D, Wang L, Huang C, Lee C . Risk factors and prognostic predictors of unexpected intensive care unit admission within 3 days after ED discharge. Am J Emerg Med. 2007; 25(9):1009-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.03.005. View