Comparing Reminders Sent Via SMS Text Messaging and Email for Improving Adherence to an Electronic Health Program: Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal JMIR Mhealth Uhealth

Specialties Biomedical Engineering
Medical Informatics

Date 2022 Mar 18

PMID 35302945

Authors

Adam Kulhanek

Katerina Lukavska

Roman Gabrhelik

Daniel Novak

Vaclav Burda

Jindrich Prokop

Marianne T S Holter

Havar Brendryen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: eHealth interventions can help people change behavior (eg, quit smoking). Reminders sent via SMS text messaging or email may improve the adherence to web-based programs and increase the probability of successful behavior change; however, it is unclear whether their efficiency is affected by the modality of the communication channel.

Objective: A 2-armed randomized control trial was conducted to compare the effect of providing reminders via SMS text messaging versus email on the adherence to an eHealth program for smoking cessation and on the probability to initiate a quit attempt.

Methods: Smokers were recruited via an internet-based advertisement. A total of 591 participants who diverted from intended use of the program (ie, failed to log on to a session) were automatically randomized to the experimental (SMS text messaging reminder, n=304) or the active comparator (email reminder, n=287) group.

Results: Unexpectedly, we found that the mode of reminder delivery did not significantly affect either the adherence, namely the number of completed program sessions, with the SMS text messaging reminder group showing a mean of 4.30 (SD 3.24) and the email reminder group showing a mean of 4.36 (SD 3.27) (t=0.197, P=.84, and Cohen d=0.016), or the outcome, namely the quit smoking attempt rate (34.2% in the SMS text messaging group vs 31.7% in the email group; χ=0.4, P=.52). Secondary analyses showed that age, gender, and education had significant effects on program adherence and education on the outcome. Moreover, we found a significant interaction effect between the mode of reminder delivery and gender on program adherence, suggesting that the effectiveness of SMS text message reminders might be different for females and males. However, this particular finding should be treated with care as it was based on post hoc subgroup analysis.

Conclusions: This study indicates that the modality of user reminders to log on increased neither the program adherence nor the probability of quitting smoking. This suggests that program developers may save costs using emails instead of SMS text messaging reminders.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03276767; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT03276767.

Citing Articles

The Framing Effect of Digital Textual Messages on Uptake Rates of Medical Checkups: Field Study.

Maltz A, Rashkovich S, Sarid A, Cohen Y, Landau T, Saifer E JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024; 10():e45379.

PMID: 38446543 PMC: 10955408. DOI: 10.2196/45379.

E-mail as a way of communication during the ACWY meningococcal vaccination campaign in adolescents and young adults in the Region of Murcia.

Zornoza Moreno M, Tornel Minarro F, Jesus Perez Martin J Vaccine X. 2024; 16:100426.

PMID: 38205135 PMC: 10776648. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100426.

Mobile-based program improves healthy eating of ulcerative colitis patients: A pilot study.

Tu W, Yan S, Yin T, Zhang S, Xu W, Zhang P Digit Health. 2023; 9:20552076231205741.

PMID: 37829613 PMC: 10566283. DOI: 10.1177/20552076231205741.

References

Webb T, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S . Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010; 12(1):e4. PMC: 2836773. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1376. View

Barello S, Triberti S, Graffigna G, Libreri C, Serino S, Hibbard J . eHealth for Patient Engagement: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol. 2016; 6:2013. PMC: 4705444. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02013. View

Graham A, Carpenter K, Cha S, Cole S, Jacobs M, Raskob M . Systematic review and meta-analysis of Internet interventions for smoking cessation among adults. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2016; 7:55-69. PMC: 4876804. DOI: 10.2147/SAR.S101660. View

Muench F, Baumel A . More Than a Text Message: Dismantling Digital Triggers to Curate Behavior Change in Patient-Centered Health Interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19(5):e147. PMC: 5466696. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7463. View

Holter M, Ness O, Johansen A, Brendryen H . Making Come-Alive and Keeping Un-Alive: How People Relate to Self-Guided Web-Based Health Interventions. Qual Health Res. 2020; 30(6):927-941. PMC: 7322942. DOI: 10.1177/1049732320902456. View

Kannisto K, Koivunen M, Valimaki M . Use of mobile phone text message reminders in health care services: a narrative literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(10):e222. PMC: 4211035. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3442. View

Holter M, Johansen A, Ness O, Brinkmann S, Hoybye M, Brendryen H . Qualitative Interview Studies of Working Mechanisms in Electronic Health: Tools to Enhance Study Quality. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(5):e10354. PMC: 6526686. DOI: 10.2196/10354. View

Danaher B, Brendryen H, Seeley J, Tyler M, Woolley T . From black box to toolbox: Outlining device functionality, engagement activities, and the pervasive information architecture of mHealth interventions. Internet Interv. 2015; 2(1):91-101. PMC: 4346786. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2015.01.002. View

Brookes S, Whitley E, Peters T, Mulheran P, Egger M, Davey Smith G . Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives. Health Technol Assess. 2001; 5(33):1-56. DOI: 10.3310/hta5330. View

10.

Reinwand D, Schulz D, Crutzen R, Kremers S, de Vries H . Who Follows eHealth Interventions as Recommended? A Study of Participants' Personal Characteristics From the Experimental Arm of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(5):e115. PMC: 4468602. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3932. View

11.

Holter M, Johansen A, Brendryen H . How a Fully Automated eHealth Program Simulates Three Therapeutic Processes: A Case Study. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18(6):e176. PMC: 4942686. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5415. View

12.

Do H, Tran B, Le Pham Q, Nguyen L, Tran T, Latkin C . Which eHealth interventions are most effective for smoking cessation? A systematic review. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018; 12:2065-2084. PMC: 6188156. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S169397. View

13.

Lustria M, Noar S, Cortese J, Van Stee S, Glueckauf R, Lee J . A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. J Health Commun. 2013; 18(9):1039-69. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.768727. View

14.

DOLL R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I . Mortality from cancer in relation to smoking: 50 years observations on British doctors. Br J Cancer. 2005; 92(3):426-9. PMC: 2362086. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602359. View

15.

Heatherton T, Kozlowski L, Frecker R, Rickert W, Robinson J . Measuring the heaviness of smoking: using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day. Br J Addict. 1989; 84(7):791-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03059.x. View

16.

Taylor G, Dalili M, Semwal M, civljak M, Sheikh A, Car J . Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 9:CD007078. PMC: 6703145. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007078.pub5. View

17.

. Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and attributable disease burden in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2021; 397(10292):2337-2360. PMC: 8223261. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01169-7. View

18.

Saul J, Amato M, Cha S, Graham A . Engagement and attrition in Internet smoking cessation interventions: Insights from a cross-sectional survey of "one-hit-wonders". Internet Interv. 2018; 5:23-29. PMC: 6096296. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.07.001. View