» Articles » PMID: 35298468

Mapping Oysters on the Pacific Coast of North America: A Coast-wide Collaboration to Inform Enhanced Conservation

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Mar 17
PMID 35298468
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To conserve coastal foundation species, it is essential to understand patterns of distribution and abundance and how they change over time. We synthesized oyster distribution data across the west coast of North America to develop conservation strategies for the native Olympia oyster (Ostrea lurida), and to characterize populations of the non-native Pacific oyster (Magallana gigas). We designed a user-friendly portal for data entry into ArcGIS Online and collected oyster records from unpublished data submitted by oyster experts and from the published literature. We used the resulting 2,000+ records to examine spatial and temporal patterns and made an interactive web-based map publicly available. Comparing records from pre-2000 vs. post-2000, we found that O. lurida significantly decreased in abundance and distribution, while M. gigas increased significantly. Currently the distribution and abundance of the two species are fairly similar, despite one species being endemic to this region since the Pleistocene, and the other a new introduction. We mapped the networks of sites occupied by oysters based on estimates of larval dispersal distance, and found that these networks were larger in Canada, Washington, and southern California than in other regions. We recommend restoration to enhance O. lurida, particularly within small networks, and to increase abundance where it declined. We also recommend restoring natural biogenic beds on mudflats and sandflats especially in the southern range, where native oysters are currently found most often on riprap and other anthropogenic structures. This project can serve as a model for collaborative mapping projects that inform conservation strategies for imperiled species or habitats.

Citing Articles

Mapping the value of commercial fishing and potential costs of offshore wind energy on the U.S: West Coast: Towards an assessment of resource use tradeoffs.

Feist B, Griffin R, Samhouri J, Riekkola L, Shelton A, Chen Y PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0315319.

PMID: 40048446 PMC: 11884673. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315319.


Weak genetic divergence and signals of adaptation obscured by high gene flow in an economically important aquaculture species.

Calla B, Song J, Thompson N BMC Genomics. 2025; 26(1):112.

PMID: 39910466 PMC: 11796273. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-025-11259-9.


Intra-decadal increase in globally-spread Magallana gigas in southern California estuaries.

Wolfe M, Bowers-Doerning C, Espinosa A, Frantz T, Hoese W, Lam J PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0302935.

PMID: 38717978 PMC: 11078413. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302935.

References
1.
Klein C, Wilson K, Watts M, Stein J, Berry S, Carwardine J . Incorporating ecological and evolutionary processes into continental-scale conservation planning. Ecol Appl. 2009; 19(1):206-17. DOI: 10.1890/07-1684.1. View

2.
Sanderson E, Redford K, Weber B, Aune K, Baldes D, Berger J . The ecological future of the North American bison: conceiving long-term, large-scale conservation of wildlife. Conserv Biol. 2008; 22(2):252-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00899.x. View

3.
Waycott M, Duarte C, Carruthers T, Orth R, Dennison W, Olyarnik S . Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(30):12377-81. PMC: 2707273. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0905620106. View

4.
Dhanjal-Adams K, Klaassen M, Nicol S, Possingham H, Chades I, Fuller R . Setting conservation priorities for migratory networks under uncertainty. Conserv Biol. 2016; 31(3):646-656. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12842. View

5.
Roemmich D . Ocean warming and sea level rise along the southwest u.s. Coast. Science. 1992; 257(5068):373-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.257.5068.373. View