Contributions of Artificial Intelligence Reported in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals: Systematic Review

Overview

Journal J Med Internet Res

Publisher JMIR Publications

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2022 Mar 17

PMID 35297766

Authors

Ferdinand Dhombres

Jules Bonnard

Kevin Bailly

Paul Maurice

Aris T Papageorghiou

Jean-Marie Jouannic

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The applications of artificial intelligence (AI) processes have grown significantly in all medical disciplines during the last decades. Two main types of AI have been applied in medicine: symbolic AI (eg, knowledge base and ontologies) and nonsymbolic AI (eg, machine learning and artificial neural networks). Consequently, AI has also been applied across most obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) domains, including general obstetrics, gynecology surgery, fetal ultrasound, and assisted reproductive medicine, among others.

Objective: The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review to establish the actual contributions of AI reported in OB/GYN discipline journals.

Methods: The PubMed database was searched for citations indexed with "artificial intelligence" and at least one of the following medical subject heading (MeSH) terms between January 1, 2000, and April 30, 2020: "obstetrics"; "gynecology"; "reproductive techniques, assisted"; or "pregnancy." All publications in OB/GYN core disciplines journals were considered. The selection of journals was based on disciplines defined in Web of Science. The publications were excluded if no AI process was used in the study. Review, editorial, and commentary articles were also excluded. The study analysis comprised (1) classification of publications into OB/GYN domains, (2) description of AI methods, (3) description of AI algorithms, (4) description of data sets, (5) description of AI contributions, and (6) description of the validation of the AI process.

Results: The PubMed search retrieved 579 citations and 66 publications met the selection criteria. All OB/GYN subdomains were covered: obstetrics (41%, 27/66), gynecology (3%, 2/66), assisted reproductive medicine (33%, 22/66), early pregnancy (2%, 1/66), and fetal medicine (21%, 14/66). Both machine learning methods (39/66) and knowledge base methods (25/66) were represented. Machine learning used imaging, numerical, and clinical data sets. Knowledge base methods used mostly omics data sets. The actual contributions of AI were method/algorithm development (53%, 35/66), hypothesis generation (42%, 28/66), or software development (3%, 2/66). Validation was performed on one data set (86%, 57/66) and no external validation was reported. We observed a general rising trend in publications related to AI in OB/GYN over the last two decades. Most of these publications (82%, 54/66) remain out of the scope of the usual OB/GYN journals.

Conclusions: In OB/GYN discipline journals, mostly preliminary work (eg, proof-of-concept algorithm or method) in AI applied to this discipline is reported and clinical validation remains an unmet prerequisite. Improvement driven by new AI research guidelines is expected. However, these guidelines are covering only a part of AI approaches (nonsymbolic) reported in this review; hence, updates need to be considered.

Citing Articles

Advancing Medical Research Through Artificial Intelligence: Progressive and Transformative Strategies: A Literature Review.

Al-Qudimat A, Fares Z, Elaarag M, Osman M, Al-Zoubi R, Aboumarzouk O Health Sci Rep. 2025; 8(2):e70200.

PMID: 39980823 PMC: 11839394. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70200.

Artificial intelligence-based prediction of second stage duration in labor: a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis.

Huang X, Di X, Lin S, Yao M, Zheng S, Liu S EClinicalMedicine. 2025; 80:103072.

PMID: 39963160 PMC: 11831126. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103072.

Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Use and Validation.

Kenig N, Monton Echeverria J, Muntaner Vives A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685566 PMC: 11642125. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237108.

Machine Learning-Based Detection of Endometriosis: A Retrospective Study in A Population of Iranian Female Patients.

Nouri B, Hashemi S, Ghadimi D, Roshandel S, Akhlaghdoust M Int J Fertil Steril. 2024; 18(4):362-366.

PMID: 39564827 PMC: 11589974. DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2024.2009338.1519.

Artificial intelligence in gynecology and obstetrics: from the enthusiasm of use in practice to the challenges of implementation.

Pinheiro Y, da Silva R Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024; 46.

PMID: 39381339 PMC: 11460420. DOI: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo41.

References

Tran D, Cooke S, Illingworth P, Gardner D . Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod. 2019; 34(6):1011-1018. PMC: 6554189. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez064. View

Legare C, Akintayo A, Blondin P, Calvo E, Sullivan R . Impact of male fertility status on the transcriptome of the bovine epididymis. Mol Hum Reprod. 2017; 23(6):355-369. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gax019. View

Shi C, Han H, Fan L, Guan J, Zheng X, Chen X . Diverse endometrial mRNA signatures during the window of implantation in patients with repeated implantation failure. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2017; 21(3):183-194. DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1324180. View

Veeramani S, Muthusamy E . Detection of abnormalities in ultrasound lung image using multi-level RVM classification. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015; 29(11):1844-52. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1064888. View

Noort F, van der Vaart C, Grob A, Van de Waarsenburg M, Slump C, van Stralen M . Deep learning enables automatic quantitative assessment of puborectalis muscle and urogenital hiatus in plane of minimal hiatal dimensions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 54(2):270-275. PMC: 6772057. DOI: 10.1002/uog.20181. View

Song Y, Liu J, Huang S, Zhang L . Analysis of differentially expressed genes in placental tissues of preeclampsia patients using microarray combined with the Connectivity Map database. Placenta. 2013; 34(12):1190-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.09.013. View

Salamalekis E, Thomopoulos P, Giannaris D, Salloum I, Vasios G, Prentza A . Computerised intrapartum diagnosis of fetal hypoxia based on fetal heart rate monitoring and fetal pulse oximetry recordings utilising wavelet analysis and neural networks. BJOG. 2002; 109(10):1137-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01388.x. View

Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I . Machine Learning in Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(14):1347-1358. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1814259. View

Blank C, Wildeboer R, DeCroo I, Tilleman K, Weyers B, De Sutter P . Prediction of implantation after blastocyst transfer in in vitro fertilization: a machine-learning perspective. Fertil Steril. 2019; 111(2):318-326. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.030. View

10.

Miyagi Y, Tada K, Yasuhi I, Maekawa Y, Okura N, Kawakami K . New method for determining fibrinogen and FDP threshold criteria by artificial intelligence in cases of massive hemorrhage during delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019; 46(2):256-265. DOI: 10.1111/jog.14166. View

11.

Santucci-Pereira J, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Afanasyeva Y, Zhong H, Slifker M, Peri S . Genomic signature of parity in the breast of premenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res. 2019; 21(1):46. PMC: 6438043. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-019-1128-x. View

12.

Shortliffe E, AXLINE S, Buchanan B, Merigan T, Cohen S . An artificial intelligence program to advise physicians regarding antimicrobial therapy. Comput Biomed Res. 1973; 6(6):544-60. DOI: 10.1016/0010-4809(73)90029-3. View

13.

Aghaeepour N, Lehallier B, Baca Q, Ganio E, Wong R, Ghaemi M . A proteomic clock of human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 218(3):347.e1-347.e14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.208. View

14.

Dhombres F, Charlet J . As Ontologies Reach Maturity, Artificial Intelligence Starts Being Fully Efficient: Findings from the Section on Knowledge Representation and Management for the Yearbook 2018. Yearb Med Inform. 2018; 27(1):140-145. PMC: 6115232. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667078. View

15.

Cao C, Wen Y, Wang X, Fang N, Yuan S, Huang X . Testicular piRNA profile comparison between successful and unsuccessful micro-TESE retrieval in NOA patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018; 35(5):801-808. PMC: 5984882. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1134-4. View

16.

Wald M, Sparks A, Sandlow J, Van-Voorhis B, Syrop C, Niederberger C . Computational models for prediction of IVF/ICSI outcomes with surgically retrieved spermatozoa. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005; 11(3):325-31. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60840-1. View

17.

Maeda K, Nagasawa T . Automatic computerized diagnosis of fetal sinusoidal heart rate. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2005; 20(5):328-34. DOI: 10.1159/000086807. View

18.

Macones G, Hausman N, Edelstein R, Stamilio D, Marder S . Predicting outcomes of trials of labor in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a comparison of multivariate methods with neural networks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184(3):409-13. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.109386. View

19.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

20.

Valensise H, Facchinetti F, Vasapollo B, Giannini F, Di Monte I, Arduini D . The computerized fetal heart rate analysis in post-term pregnancy identifies patients at risk for fetal distress in labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 125(2):185-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.034. View