» Articles » PMID: 35296476

Effectiveness and Safety of Weekly Therapy Versus 3-weekly Therapy of Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin in Women with Ovarian Cancer: a Protocol of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Mar 17
PMID 35296476
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Network meta-analyses have confirmed that paclitaxel plus carboplatin could improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with platinum alone. However, detailed implementation schedule (weekly or 3-weekly therapy) was not specified in clinical practice guidelines. Evidence from studies is also inconsistent. We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the benefits and harms of weekly therapy and 3-weekly therapy of paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in women with ovarian cancer.

Methods: We will search PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases to include relevant randomised controlled trials comparing weekly therapy versus 3-weekly therapy of paclitaxel combined with carboplatin for women with ovarian cancer. Random-effects model will be used to pool data for patient-reported outcomes including survival rate, OS, PFS and adverse events. Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to rate the quality of evidence.

Ethics And Dissemination: This systematic review and meta-analysis will be based on published data and does not therefore require specific ethical approval or consent for participation. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Osf Registration Number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/GJUMA.

References
1.
Baird R, Tan D, Kaye S . Weekly paclitaxel in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010; 7(10):575-82. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.120. View

2.
Qu C, Sun G, Yang S, Tian J, Si J, Wang Y . Toxicities of different first-line chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: A network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(2):e5797. PMC: 5266167. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005797. View

3.
Jiang X, Rui X, Guo C, Huang Y, Li Q, Xu Y . A network meta-analysis of eight chemotherapy regimens for treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 2016; 8(12):19125-19136. PMC: 5386673. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13253. View

4.
Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M . Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015; 350:g7647. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g7647. View

5.
Ge L, Tian J, Li Y, Pan J, Li G, Wei D . Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 93:45-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.012. View