» Articles » PMID: 35296369

Applying Implementation Science Frameworks to Identify Factors That Influence the Intention of Healthcare Providers to Offer PrEP Care and Advocate for PrEP in HIV Clinics in Colombia: a Cross-sectional Study

Abstract

Background: Few studies have used implementation science frameworks to identify determinants of PrEP prescription by healthcare providers. In this work, we developed and psychometrically examined a questionnaire using the theoretical domains framework (TDF) and the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). We used this questionnaire to investigate what factors influence the intention of healthcare providers to offer PrEP care and advocate for PrEP.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 16 HIV healthcare organizations in Colombia. A 98-item questionnaire was administered online to 129 healthcare professionals. One hundred had complete data for this analysis. We used exploratory factor analysis to assess the psychometric properties of both frameworks, and multinomial regression analysis to evaluate the associations of the frameworks' domains with two outcomes: (1) intention to offer PrEP care and (2) intention to advocate for PrEP impmentation.

Results: We found support for nine indices with good internal consistency, reflecting PrEP characteristics, attitudes towards population needs, concerns about the use of PrEP, concerns about the role of the healthcare systems, knowledge, beliefs about capabilities, professional role, social influence, and beliefs about consequences. Notably, only 57% of the participants were likely to have a plan to care for people in PrEP and 66.7% were likely to advocate for PrEP. The perception of the need for PrEP in populations, the value of PrEP as a practice, the influence of colleagues, and seeing PrEP care as a priority was related to being less likely to be unwilling to provide or advocate for PrEP care.

Conclusion: Our findings suggested the importance of multilevel strategies to increase the provision of PrEP care by healthcare providers including adquisition of new skills, training of PrEP champions, and strength the capacity of the health system.

Citing Articles

Determinants of Familiarity and Experience with HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Primary Care Providers in Ontario, Canada.

Martinez-Cajas J, Alvarado B, Rapino C, Nagy E, Guan T, Cofie N J Prim Care Community Health. 2025; 16():21501319251315566.

PMID: 39846350 PMC: 11755537. DOI: 10.1177/21501319251315566.


Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among people who use drugs: a qualitative scoping review of implementation determinants and change methods.

Merle J, Zapata J, Quieroz A, Zamantakis A, Sanuade O, Mustanski B Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024; 19(1):46.

PMID: 38816889 PMC: 11138081. DOI: 10.1186/s13722-024-00478-2.

References
1.
Hakre S, Blaylock J, Dawson P, Beckett C, Garges E, Michael N . Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among US Air Force Health Care Providers. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(32):e4511. PMC: 4985324. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004511. View

2.
Bil J, Hoornenborg E, Prins M, Hogewoning A, Dias Goncalves Lima F, de Vries H . The Acceptability of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: Beliefs of Health-Care Professionals Working in Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinics and HIV Treatment Centers. Front Public Health. 2018; 6:5. PMC: 5811525. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00005. View

3.
Cerqueira N, Vasconcelos R, Hojilla J, Kallas E, Avelino-Silva V . Attitudes and Knowledge About Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Brazilian Infectious Disease Physicians. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2020; 36(12):1047-1053. DOI: 10.1089/AID.2019.0281. View

4.
Saberi P, Berrean B, Thomas S, Gandhi M, Scott H . A Simple Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Optimization Intervention for Health Care Providers Prescribing PrEP: Pilot Study. JMIR Form Res. 2019; 2(1). PMC: 6325636. DOI: 10.2196/formative.8623. View

5.
Keith R, Crosson J, OMalley A, Cromp D, Taylor E . Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: a rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implement Sci. 2017; 12(1):15. PMC: 5303301. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7. View