» Articles » PMID: 35294964

Non-rolling Flag Leaves Use an Effective Mechanism to Reduce Water Loss and Light-induced Damage Under Drought Stress

Overview
Journal Ann Bot
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Mar 16
PMID 35294964
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: The study reports on four different types of flag leaf rolling under soil drought in relation to the level of cell wall-bound phenolics. The flag leaf colonization by aphids, as a possible bioindicator of the accumulation of cell wall-bound phenolics, was also estimated.

Methods: The proteins of the photosynthetic apparatus that form its core and are crucial for maintaining its stability (D1/PsbA protein), limit destructive effects of light (PsbS, a protein binding carotenoids in the antennas) and participate in efficient electron transport between photosystems II (PSII) and PSI (Rieske iron-sulfur protein of the cytochrome b6f complex) were evaluated in two types of flag leaf rolling. Additionally, biochemical and physiological reactions to drought stress in rolling and non-rolling flag leaves were compared.

Key Results: The study identified four types of genome-related types of flag leaf rolling. The biochemical basis for these differences was a different number of phenolic molecules incorporated into polycarbohydrate structures of the cell wall. In an extreme case of non-rolling dehydrated flag leaves, they were found to accumulate high amounts of cell wall-bound phenolics that limited cell water loss and protected the photosynthetic apparatus against excessive light. PSII was also additionally protected against excess light by the accumulation of photosynthetic apparatus proteins that ensured stable and efficient transport of excitation energy beyond PSII and its dissipation as far-red fluorescence and heat. Our analysis revealed a new type of flag leaf rolling brought about by an interaction between wheat and rye genomes, and resulting in biochemical specialization of flexible, rolling and rigid, non-rolling parts of the flag leaf. The study confirmed limited aphid colonization of the flag leaves with enhanced content of cell wall-bound phenolics.

Conclusions: Non-rolling leaves developed effective adaptation mechanisms to reduce both water loss and photoinhibitory damage to the photosynthetic apparatus under drought stress.

Citing Articles

The Genome Regions Associated with Abiotic and Biotic Stress Tolerance, as Well as Other Important Breeding Traits in Triticale.

Golebiowska-Paluch G, Dyda M Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36771703 PMC: 9919094. DOI: 10.3390/plants12030619.


Cell dehydration of intergeneric hybrid induces subgenome-related specific responses.

Hura T, Hura K, Dziurka K, Ostrowska A, Urban K Physiol Plant. 2023; 175(1):e13855.

PMID: 36648214 PMC: 10108068. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.13855.


Plants and water: the search for a comprehensive understanding.

Rockwell F, Sage R Ann Bot. 2022; 130(3):i-viii.

PMID: 35997781 PMC: 9486925. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcac107.

References
1.
Baret F, Madec S, Irfan K, Lopez J, Comar A, Hemmerle M . Leaf-rolling in maize crops: from leaf scoring to canopy-level measurements for phenotyping. J Exp Bot. 2018; 69(10):2705-2716. PMC: 5920318. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ery071. View

2.
Hura T, Tyrka M, Hura K, Ostrowska A, Dziurka K . QTLs for cell wall-bound phenolics in relation to the photosynthetic apparatus activity and leaf water status under drought stress at different growth stages of triticale. Mol Genet Genomics. 2016; 292(2):415-433. DOI: 10.1007/s00438-016-1276-y. View

3.
Meyer S, Cartelat A, Moya I, Cerovic Z . UV-induced blue-green and far-red fluorescence along wheat leaves: a potential signature of leaf ageing. J Exp Bot. 2003; 54(383):757-69. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erg063. View

4.
Kuleung C, Baenziger P, Dweikat I . Transferability of SSR markers among wheat, rye, and triticale. Theor Appl Genet. 2004; 108(6):1147-50. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-003-1532-5. View

5.
Guidi L, Lo Piccolo E, Landi M . Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Photoinhibition and Abiotic Stress: Does it Make Any Difference the Fact to Be a C3 or C4 Species?. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10:174. PMC: 6382737. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00174. View