Return to Work and Sport After a Humeral Shaft Fracture

Overview

Journal Bone Jt Open

Date 2022 Mar 16

PMID 35293229

Authors

William M Oliver

Samuel G Molyneux

Timothy O White

Nick D Clement

Andrew D Duckworth

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aims: The primary aim of this study was to determine the rates of return to work (RTW) and sport (RTS) following a humeral shaft fracture. The secondary aim was to identify factors independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS.

Methods: From 2008 to 2017, all patients with a humeral diaphyseal fracture were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics and injury characteristics were recorded. Details of pre-injury employment, sporting participation, and levels of return post-injury were obtained via postal questionnaire. The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale was used to quantify physical activity among active patients. Regression was used to determine factors independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS.

Results: The Work Group comprised 177 patients in employment prior to injury (mean age 47 years (17 to 78); 51% female (n = 90)). Mean follow-up was 5.8 years (1.3 to 11). Overall, 85% (n = 151) returned to work at a mean of 14 weeks post-injury (0 to 104), but only 60% (n = 106) returned full-time to their previous employment. Proximal-third fractures (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2 to 14.2); p = 0.029) were independently associated with failure to RTW. The Sport Group comprised 182 patients involved in sport prior to injury (mean age 52 years (18 to 85); 57% female (n = 104)). Mean follow-up was 5.4 years (1.3 to 11). The mean UCLA score reduced from 6.9 (95% CI 6.6 to 7.2) before injury to 6.1 (95% CI 5.8 to 6.4) post-injury (p < 0.001). There were 89% (n = 162) who returned to sport: 8% (n = 14) within three months, 34% (n = 62) within six months, and 70% (n = 127) within one year. Age ≥ 60 years was independently associated with failure to RTS (aOR 3.0 (95% CI 1.1 to 8.2); p = 0.036). No other factors were independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS.

Conclusion: Most patients successfully return to work and sport following a humeral shaft fracture, albeit at a lower level of physical activity. Patients aged ≥ 60 yrs and those with proximal-third diaphyseal fractures are at increased risk of failing to return to activity. Cite this article: 2022;3(3):236-244.

Citing Articles

Return to Work after Upper or Lower Extremity Long Bone Fractures: Social Factors in a Japanese Multicenter Cohort Study.

Ishii K, Oka H, Inokuchi K, Maehara T, Higashikawa A, Sasashige Y JMA J. 2025; 8(1):234-241.

PMID: 39926076 PMC: 11799726. DOI: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0157.

Return to work after proximal humeral fractures: a single center study comparing conservative versus operative treatment.

Hameleers A, Most J, Schotanus M, Wijnands N, Dremmen M, van Vugt R Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2025; 17:128106.

PMID: 39882031 PMC: 11779521. DOI: 10.52965/001c.128106.

Comparing the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Humeral Shaft Fractures by Treatment Type.

James C, Haan J, Wager S, Hegde Y, Wolterink T, Muh S Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e58658.

PMID: 38770447 PMC: 11105806. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58658.

Routine fixation of humeral shaft fractures is cost-effective : cost-utility analysis of 215 patients at a mean of five years following nonoperative management.

Oliver W, Molyneux S, White T, Clement N, Duckworth A Bone Jt Open. 2022; 3(7):566-572.

PMID: 35822554 PMC: 9350699. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0047.R1.

References

Shields E, Sundem L, Childs S, Maceroli M, Humphrey C, Ketz J . Factors predicting patient-reported functional outcome scores after humeral shaft fractures. Injury. 2015; 46(4):693-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.027. View

Sarmiento A, Kinman P, Galvin E, Schmitt R, Phillips J . Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977; 59(5):596-601. View

Oliver W, Searle H, Molyneux S, White T, Clement N, Duckworth A . Factors Associated with Patient-Reported Outcomes Following a Humeral Shaft Fracture: Nonunion Results in a Poorer Outcome Despite Union after Surgical Fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2022; 36(6):e227-e235. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002315. View

Schoch B, Padegimas E, Maltenfort M, Krieg J, Namdari S . Humeral shaft fractures: national trends in management. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017; 18(3):259-263. PMC: 5585093. DOI: 10.1007/s10195-017-0459-6. View

Ogawa K, Yoshida A . Throwing fracture of the humeral shaft. An analysis of 90 patients. Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26(2):242-6. DOI: 10.1177/03635465980260021401. View

Court-Brown C, Caesar B . Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006; 37(8):691-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. View

Changulani M, Jain U, Keswani T . Comparison of the use of the humerus intramedullary nail and dynamic compression plate for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A randomised controlled study. Int Orthop. 2006; 31(3):391-5. PMC: 2267584. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0200-1. View

Craig C, Marshall A, Sjostrom M, Bauman A, Booth M, Ainsworth B . International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(8):1381-95. DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB. View

Oliver W, Searle H, Ng Z, Wickramasinghe N, Molyneux S, White T . Fractures of the proximal- and middle-thirds of the humeral shaft should be considered as fragility fractures. Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-B(11):1475-1483. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-0993.R1. View

10.

Zahiri C, Schmalzried T, Szuszczewicz E, Amstutz H . Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty. 1999; 13(8):890-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90195-4. View

11.

Koch P, Gross D, Gerber C . The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11(2):143-50. DOI: 10.1067/mse.2002.121634. View

12.

Matsunaga F, Tamaoki M, Matsumoto M, Netto N, Faloppa F, Belloti J . Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99(7):583-592. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00628. View

13.

Serrano R, Mir H, Sagi H, Horwitz D, Borade A, Tidwell J . Modern Results of Functional Bracing of Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2020; 34(4):206-209. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001666. View

14.

Lee T, Kwon D, Na S, Cha S . Modified combined approach for distal humerus shaft fracture: anterolateral and lateral bimodal approach. Clin Orthop Surg. 2013; 5(3):209-15. PMC: 3758991. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2013.5.3.209. View

15.

Lorich D, Geller D, Yacoubian S, Leo A, Helfet D . Intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures using an inflatable nail. Orthopedics. 2003; 26(10):1011-4. DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-20031001-10. View

16.

Mahajan A, Kim Y, Kim J, Dsa P, Lakhani A, Ok H . Is Anterior Bridge Plating for Mid-Shaft Humeral Fractures a Suitable Option for Patients Predominantly Involved in Overhead Activities? A Functional Outcome Study in Athletes and Manual Laborers. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016; 8(4):358-366. PMC: 5114246. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2016.8.4.358. View

17.

Morshed S, Corrales L, Genant H, Miclau 3rd T . Outcome assessment in clinical trials of fracture-healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90 Suppl 1:62-7. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01556. View

18.

OHara N, Isaac M, Slobogean G, Klazinga N . The socioeconomic impact of orthopaedic trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0227907. PMC: 6961943. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227907. View

19.

Hendy B, Zmistowski B, Wells Z, Abboud J, Namdari S . Humeral Shaft Fractures: Surgical versus Nonsurgical Management in Workers' Compensation. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2020; 8(6):668-674. PMC: 7718578. DOI: 10.22038/abjs.2020.44301.2211. View

20.

Ristic V, Maljanovic M, Arsic M, Matijevic R, Milankov M . Comparison of the results of treatment of humeral shaft fractures by different methods. Med Pregl. 2011; 64(9-10):490-6. View