Use of Tactile Contact Accompanying Health Prmotion Messages During Routine Health & Physical Examinations: A Technique for Improving Compliance

Overview

Journal J Public Health Int

Date 2022 Mar 16

PMID 35291713

Authors

Ralph Jay Johnson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A daunting challenge for health providers and medical practitioners is communicating the vital importance of health promotion and medical treatment adherence and compliance. This article is an evidence-based, best-practices commentary advocating the use of touch-accompanied verbal suggestions during the touching portions of routine, near-universal Health & Physical examinations. Notional case examples are presented; based on the professional literature, underlying Behavioral Mechanics are discussed. Touch-accompanied verbal health promotion messages skillfully deployed in routine Health & Physical examinations offer a non-harmful and efficient technique to synergistically and substantially enhance the probability of patient compliance with health improvement and medical treatment regimens. Though it is not a magic panacea, the public health applications, extensions and benefits are incalculable in terms of healthy behavior adoption. Additionally, if deftly conducted in accordance with best practices, it has the potential to greatly improve practitioner-patient relations and increase patient satisfaction. Further avenues of research inquiry are considered.

References

Oboler S, Prochazka A, Gonzales R, Xu S, Anderson R . Public expectations and attitudes for annual physical examinations and testing. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136(9):652-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-9-200205070-00007. View

Swift J, Greenberg R, Tompkins K, Parkin S . Treatment refusal and premature termination in psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and their combination: A meta-analysis of head-to-head comparisons. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2017; 54(1):47-57. DOI: 10.1037/pst0000104. View

Reach G . Patient education, nudge, and manipulation: defining the ethical conditions of the person-centered model of care. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016; 10:459-68. PMC: 4829190. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S99627. View

Woolley F, Kane R, Hughes C, Wright D . The effects of doctor--patient communication on satisfaction and outcome of care. Soc Sci Med (1967). 1978; 12(2A):123-8. View

Hoey J . What does the public want in an annual check-up?. CMAJ. 2002; 167(2):171. PMC: 117100. View

Singh C, Leder D . Touch in the consultation. Br J Gen Pract. 2012; 62(596):147-8. PMC: 3289810. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X630133. View

Brown W . Theories of Suggestion. Proc R Soc Med. 2009; 21(4):573-82. PMC: 2102090. View

Davidhizar R, Giger J . When touch is not the best approach. J Clin Nurs. 1997; 6(3):203-6. View

Cocksedge S, George B, Renwick S, Chew-Graham C . Touch in primary care consultations: qualitative investigation of doctors' and patients' perceptions. Br J Gen Pract. 2013; 63(609):e283-90. PMC: 3609476. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X665251. View

10.

Reeves J, Ayers J, Longhurst C . Telehealth in the COVID-19 Era: A Balancing Act to Avoid Harm. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(2):e24785. PMC: 7857524. DOI: 10.2196/24785. View

11.

Routasalo P . Physical touch in nursing studies: a literature review. J Adv Nurs. 1999; 30(4):843-50. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01156.x. View

12.

de Zulueta P . Touch matters: COVID-19, physical examination, and 21st century general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2020; 70(701):594-595. PMC: 7707044. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713705. View

13.

Larsen K, Smith C . Assessment of nonverbal communication in the patient-physician interview. J Fam Pract. 1981; 12(3):481-8. View

14.

Gueguen N, Fischer-Lokou J . Another evaluation of touch and helping behavior. Psychol Rep. 2003; 92(1):62-4. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.2003.92.1.62. View

15.

ABARBANEL-BRANDT A . SEMANTICS OF AUTO-SUGGESTION. Br J Med Hypn. 1965; 16:2-7. View

16.

Wool M . Public expectation for annual physical examinations. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137(9):773-4; author reply 773-4. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-9-200211050-00020. View

17.

Gueguen N, Jacob C . Direct look versus evasive glance and compliance with a request. J Soc Psychol. 2002; 142(3):393-6. DOI: 10.1080/00224540209603907. View

18.

Pappan N, Benkhadra R, Papincak D, Ashker K, Uchin J, Sidique N . Values and Limits of Telemedicine: a Case Report. SN Compr Clin Med. 2021; 3(1):317-319. PMC: 7781422. DOI: 10.1007/s42399-020-00725-y. View

19.

Rosenstock I . Understanding and enhancing patient compliance with diabetic regimens. Diabetes Care. 1985; 8(6):610-6. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.8.6.610. View

20.

Johnson R . Tactile Contact as a Marketing Tool for Improving an HIV/STD Education Program's Compliance / Retention with Crack Cocaine Users. Psychol Ment Health Care. 2020; 4(1). PMC: 7059775. View