» Articles » PMID: 35291489

Effect of Magnification Factor by Galilean Loupes on Working Posture of Dental Students in Simulated Clinical Procedures: Associations Between Direct and Observational Measurements

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2022 Mar 16
PMID 35291489
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine the effect of different levels of Galilean loupe magnification on working posture as measured by compliance with ergonomic posture positions, angular deviation from the neutral position of the neck, and muscle activation in the neck and upper back region during simulated clinical conditions.

Methods: An experimental laboratory study was performed in which the dependent variables were compliance with ergonomic posture requirements while performing simulated restorative procedures in Restorative Dentistry, angular deviation from the neutral position of the neck, and muscle activation in the neck and upper back. The independent variable was the level of Galilean loupe magnification, which was tested at four levels (naked eye, 2.5× magnification, 3.0× magnification, and 3.5× magnification). The cavity preparations and Class I composite resin restorations were performed on artificial first molars on a mannequin in a dental chair. The Compliance Assessment of Dental Ergonomic Posture Requirements (CADEP) was used for the postural analysis; as was an analysis of the angular deviation from the neutral position of the neck and surface electromyography. Working posture was recorded on video over the course of the procedure. Participants were filmed from three different angles. The Compliance Assessment of Dental Ergonomic Posture Requirements (CADEP) assessed compliance with ergonomic posture requirements. A locally produced posture assessment software analyzed angular deviation. Surface electromyography bilaterally assessed activation of the sternocleidomastoid, descending trapezius and ascending trapezius muscles. Two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) and either Tukey's post-hoc test or the Games-Howell post-hoc test were performed (α = 0.05).

Results: During the cavity preparations and restorations, the use of Galilean loupes at all magnifications positively influenced working posture as measured by participants' compliance with ergonomic posture positions ( < 0.01) and neck angulation ( < 0.01); the use of these loupes did not affect muscle activation in the regions evaluated ( > 0.05).

Conclusion: The use of Galilean loupes had a positive effect on dental students' working posture during the restoration procedures performed.

Citing Articles

Impact of dental operative microscopes on precision in minimally invasive dental restoration procedures.

Wang P, Zhang L, Chen C, Yu Q Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(8):3907-3914.

PMID: 39262722 PMC: 11384380. DOI: 10.62347/DWNQ1400.


Effect of loupe and microscope on dentists' neck and shoulder muscle workload during crown preparation.

Hong S, Park J, Jeon M, Shin S, Park J, Park J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17489.

PMID: 39080435 PMC: 11289447. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68538-w.


Magnification in preclinical procedures: effect on muscle activity and angular deviations of the neck and trunk.

Pazos J, Fernandes A, Verri E, Gomes G, Regalo S, Garcia P PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17188.

PMID: 38650644 PMC: 11034494. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17188.


Impact of using magnifying dental loupes on clinical performance during tooth preparation: A systematic review.

Costa R, Miranda S, Montes M, Ribeiro A, Carreiro A, Moraes S J Clin Exp Dent. 2024; 16(2):e186-e197.

PMID: 38496818 PMC: 10943671. DOI: 10.4317/jced.61098.


Effect of finger rest positions on upper limb muscle activity during pre-clinical procedures.

Pazos J, Segnini Tiberti M, Regalo S, Dovigo L, Garcia P PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15663.

PMID: 37520265 PMC: 10386821. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15663.


References
1.
Garcia P, Wajngarten D, Campos J . Development of a method to assess compliance with ergonomic posture in dental students. J Educ Health Promot. 2018; 7:44. PMC: 5903147. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_66_17. View

2.
Branson B, Bray K, Gadbury-Amyot C, Holt L, Keselyak N, Mitchell T . Effect of magnification lenses on student operator posture. J Dent Educ. 2004; 68(3):384-9. View

3.
Valachi B, Valachi K . Mechanisms leading to musculoskeletal disorders in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134(10):1344-50. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0048. View

4.
Maillet J, Millar A, Burke J, Maillet M, Maillet W, Neish N . Effect of magnification loupes on dental hygiene student posture. J Dent Educ. 2008; 72(1):33-44. View

5.
Garcia P, Gottardello A, Wajngarten D, Presoto C, Campos J . Ergonomics in dentistry: experiences of the practice by dental students. Eur J Dent Educ. 2016; 21(3):175-179. DOI: 10.1111/eje.12197. View