» Articles » PMID: 35284957

Potential of Blood-based Biomarker Approaches in Endometrium and Breast Cancer: a Case-control Comparison Study

Overview
Date 2022 Mar 14
PMID 35284957
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Endometrial carcinoma is the second most common gynecological malignancy. Until today lacking a screening tool. A blood-based biomarker could help address this need.

Methods: The expression levels of 30 acylcarnitines, 18 amino acids, 6 miRNAs, and 7 DNA methylation sites were measured in blood samples from 331 women (20 EC, 14 benign uterine lesions (benign), 140 breast cancers (BC), 157 controls). Areas under the ROC curves (AUC), sensitivity (sens.) and specificity (spec.) were computed to identify the variables best distinguishing.

Results: The best top ten markers for the four comparisons (cancer vs. cancer-free; EC vs. BC, EC vs. controls; EC vs. benign), were identified via AUC. Malonylcarnitine distinguished best patients with EC from controls (AUC: 0.827, sens. 80%, spec. 73.1%) or BC (AUC: 0.819, sens. 84.3%, spec. 80%) being most notable. Tryptophan best differentiated benign from EC (AUC: 0.846, sens. 70%, spec. 92.9%).

Conclusions: The levels of the analyzed blood markers yielded promising results in the detection of EC and warrant further evaluation.

Citing Articles

Unveiling DNA methylation: early diagnosis, risk assessment, and therapy for endometrial cancer.

Li M, Xia Z, Wang R, Xi M, Hou M Front Oncol. 2025; 14:1455255.

PMID: 39902129 PMC: 11788147. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1455255.


Research Progress of DNA Methylation Markers for Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosis.

Zheng H, Yu C, Yang L, Zhou F, Liu A J Cancer. 2025; 16(3):812-820.

PMID: 39781343 PMC: 11705058. DOI: 10.7150/jca.104214.


Endometrial cancer diagnostic and prognostic algorithms based on proteomics, metabolomics, and clinical data: a systematic review.

Romano A, Rizner T, Werner H, Semczuk A, Lowy C, Schroder C Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1120178.

PMID: 37091170 PMC: 10118013. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1120178.


Diagnostic Accuracy of Liquid Biomarkers for the Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Karkia R, Wali S, Payne A, Karteris E, Chatterjee J Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(19).

PMID: 36230588 PMC: 9563808. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194666.

References
1.
Miyagi Y, Higashiyama M, Gochi A, Akaike M, Ishikawa T, Miura T . Plasma free amino acid profiling of five types of cancer patients and its application for early detection. PLoS One. 2011; 6(9):e24143. PMC: 3168486. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024143. View

2.
Hatse S, Brouwers B, Dalmasso B, Laenen A, Kenis C, Schoffski P . Circulating MicroRNAs as easy-to-measure aging biomarkers in older breast cancer patients: correlation with chronological age but not with fitness/frailty status. PLoS One. 2014; 9(10):e110644. PMC: 4204997. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110644. View

3.
Park J, Shin Y, Kim T, Kim D, Lee A . Plasma metabolites as possible biomarkers for diagnosis of breast cancer. PLoS One. 2019; 14(12):e0225129. PMC: 6890236. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225129. View

4.
Zhang C, Wang B, Wu L . MicroRNA‑409 may function as a tumor suppressor in endometrial carcinoma cells by targeting Smad2. Mol Med Rep. 2018; 19(1):622-628. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9642. View

5.
Steiber A, Kerner J, Hoppel C . Carnitine: a nutritional, biosynthetic, and functional perspective. Mol Aspects Med. 2004; 25(5-6):455-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2004.06.006. View