» Articles » PMID: 35284380

Cost-Effectiveness of Sequential Teriparatide/Zoledronic Acid Compared With Zoledronic Acid Monotherapy for Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women in China

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Mar 14
PMID 35284380
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of sequential teriparatide/zoledronic acid relative to zoledronic acid monotherapy for postmenopausal osteoporotic women in China.

Methods: A previously validated Markov microsimulation model was updated to examine the cost-effectiveness of daily subcutaneous teriparatide for 2 years followed by annual intravenous zoledronic acid for 3 years (sequential teriparatide/zoledronic acid), compared with zoledronic acid monotherapy for 3 years in Chinese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis at ages 65, 70, 75, and 80 from the health care payer perspective.

Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) (US dollars [$] per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]) of sequential teriparatide/zoledronic acid vs. zoledronic acid monotherapy was $173,223/QALY at age 65 years, which was much higher than the pre-determined willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $ 31,512/QALY, and the results were similar at other ages. In one-way sensitivity analyses, the two most impactful parameters were the cost of teriparatide and the residual effects of the medications included in this study. Sequential teriparatide/zoledronic acid became cost-effective at age 80 with the cost of teriparatide reduced by 50%. Without the residual effect, the ICER increased to $257,982/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses shown that the probabilities of zoledronic acid monotherapy being cost-effective were 100% at a WTP of $31,512/QALY.

Conclusions: Among Chinese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, sequential teriparatide/zoledronic acid was not cost-effective unless the cost of teriparatide was reduced by 50% only for the participants over 80 years.

Citing Articles

[Teriparatide regulates osteoblast differentiation in high-glucose microenvironment through the cAMP/PKA/CREB signaling pathway].

Hou T, Qin Y, Zhang Y, Wen G, Qi M, Dong W Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2023; 43(1):39-45.

PMID: 36856208 PMC: 9978729. DOI: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2023.01.05.


A systematic review of cost‑effectiveness analyses of sequential treatment for osteoporosis.

Yu G, Tong S, Liu J, Wan Y, Wan M, Li S Osteoporos Int. 2022; 34(4):641-658.

PMID: 36527476 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06626-1.

References
1.
Adler R, Fuleihan G, Bauer D, Camacho P, Clarke B, Clines G . Managing Osteoporosis in Patients on Long-Term Bisphosphonate Treatment: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res. 2015; 31(1):16-35. PMC: 4906542. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2708. View

2.
You R, Liu Z . Economic Evaluation of Oral Alendronate Therapy for Osteoporosis in Chinese Postmenopausal Women: The Impact of Medication Compliance and Persistence. Front Pharmacol. 2020; 11:575893. PMC: 7751696. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.575893. View

3.
Cosman F, Nieves J, Dempster D . Treatment Sequence Matters: Anabolic and Antiresorptive Therapy for Osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2016; 32(2):198-202. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3051. View

4.
Mori T, Crandall C, Ganz D . Cost-Effectiveness of Sequential Teriparatide/Alendronate Versus Alendronate-Alone Strategies in High-Risk Osteoporotic Women in the US: Analyzing the Impact of Generic/Biosimilar Teriparatide. JBMR Plus. 2019; 3(11):e10233. PMC: 6874180. DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10233. View

5.
Melton 3rd L, Achenbach S, Atkinson E, Therneau T, Amin S . Long-term mortality following fractures at different skeletal sites: a population-based cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 2012; 24(5):1689-96. PMC: 3630278. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2225-1. View