» Articles » PMID: 35284194

Robustness of Diffuse Reflectance Spectra Analysis by Inverse Adding Doubling Algorithm

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Mar 14
PMID 35284194
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Analysing diffuse reflectance spectra to extract properties of biological tissue requires modelling of light transport within the tissue, considering its absorption, scattering, and geometrical properties. Due to the layered skin structure, skin tissue models are often divided into multiple layers with their associated optical properties. Typically, in the analysis, some model parameters defining these properties are fixed to values reported in the literature to speed up the fitting process and improve its performance. In the absence of consensus, various studies use different approaches in fixing the model parameters. This study aims to assess the effect of fixing various model parameters in the skin spectra fitting process on the accuracy and robustness of a GPU-accelerated two-layer inverse adding-doubling (IAD) algorithm. Specifically, the performance of the IAD method is determined for noiseless simulated skin spectra, simulated spectra with different levels of noise applied, and in-vivo measured reflectance spectra from hyperspectral images of human hands recorded before, during, and after the arterial occlusion. Our results suggest that fixing multiple parameters to a priori known values generally improves the robustness and accuracy of the IAD algorithm for simulated spectra. However, for in-vivo measured spectra, these values are unknown in advance and fixing optical parameters to incorrect values significantly deteriorates the overall performance. Therefore, we propose a method to improve the fitting performance by pre-estimating model parameters. Our findings could be considered in all future research involving the analysis of diffuse reflectance spectra to extract optical properties of skin tissue.

Citing Articles

Robust estimation of skin physiological parameters from hyperspectral images using Bayesian neural networks.

Manojlovic T, Tomanic T, Stajduhar I, Milanic M J Biomed Opt. 2025; 30(1):016004.

PMID: 39822706 PMC: 11737236. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.30.1.016004.


Towards reliable hyperspectral imaging biomarkers of CT26 murine tumor model.

Tomanic T, Stergar J, Bozic T, Markelc B, Brezar S, Sersa G Heliyon. 2024; 10(21):e39816.

PMID: 39553684 PMC: 11567117. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39816.


Hyperspectral imaging of 4T1 mammary carcinomas grown in dorsal skinfold window chambers: spectral renormalization and fluorescence modeling.

Tomanic T, Bozic T, Markelc B, Stergar J, Sersa G, Milanic M J Biomed Opt. 2024; 29(9):093504.

PMID: 39040986 PMC: 11262746. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.9.093504.


Hyperspectral evaluation of vasculature in induced peritonitis mouse models.

Stergar J, Lakota K, Perse M, Tomsic M, Milanic M Biomed Opt Express. 2022; 13(6):3461-3475.

PMID: 35781958 PMC: 9208583. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.460288.

References
1.
Fredriksson I, Burdakov O, Larsson M, Stromberg T . Inverse Monte Carlo in a multilayered tissue model: merging diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and laser Doppler flowmetry. J Biomed Opt. 2013; 18(12):127004. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.12.127004. View

2.
Sardar D, Mayo M, Glickman R . Optical characterization of melanin. J Biomed Opt. 2001; 6(4):404-11. DOI: 10.1117/1.1411978. View

3.
Sardar D, Salinas F, Perez J, Tsin A . Optical characterization of bovine retinal tissues. J Biomed Opt. 2004; 9(3):624-31. DOI: 10.1117/1.1688813. View

4.
Sardar D, Yow R, Tsin A, Sardar R . Optical scattering, absorption, and polarization of healthy and neovascularized human retinal tissues. J Biomed Opt. 2005; 10(5):051501. DOI: 10.1117/1.2065867. View

5.
Wang L, Jacques S, Zheng L . MCML--Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in multi-layered tissues. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1995; 47(2):131-46. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2607(95)01640-f. View