The Impact of Different Types of Auditory Warnings on Working Memory

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2022 Mar 14

PMID 35282225

Authors

Zhaoli Lei

Shu Ma

Hongting Li

Zhen Yang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Auditory warnings have been shown to interfere with verbal working memory. However, the impact of different types of auditory warnings on working memory tasks must be further researched. This study investigated how different kinds of auditory warnings interfered with verbal and spatial working memory. Experiment 1 tested the potential interference of auditory warnings with verbal working memory. Experiment 2 tested the potential interference of auditory warnings with spatial working memory. Both experiments used a 3 × 3 mixed design: auditory warning type (auditory icons, earcons, or spearcons) was between groups, and task condition (no-warning, identify-warning, or ignore-warning) was within groups. In Experiment 1, earcons and spearcons but not auditory icons worsened the performance on the verbal serial recall task in the identify-warning condition, compared with that in the no-warning or ignore-warning conditions. In Experiment 2, only identifying earcons worsened the performance on the location recall task compared with performance without auditory warnings or when auditory warnings were ignored. Results are discussed from the perspective of working memory resource interference, and their practical application in the selection and design of auditory warning signals is involved.

References

Hudjetz A, Oberauer K . The effects of processing time and processing rate on forgetting in working memory: testing four models of the complex span paradigm. Mem Cognit. 2007; 35(7):1675-84. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193501. View

Vergauwe E, Barrouillet P, Camos V . Do mental processes share a domain-general resource?. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(3):384-90. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610361340. View

Baddeley A . Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003; 4(10):829-39. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1201. View

Hughes R, Jones D . The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005; 31(2):316-27. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.316. View

Macken W, Phelps F, Jones D . What causes auditory distraction?. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009; 16(1):139-44. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.139. View

Hein G, Schubert T, von Cramon D . Closed head injury and perceptual processing in dual-task situations. Exp Brain Res. 2004; 160(2):223-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2006-y. View

Isherwood S, McKeown D . Semantic congruency of auditory warnings. Ergonomics. 2016; 60(7):1014-1023. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1237677. View

Li S, Tang T, Hickling A, Yau S, Brecknell B, Sanderson P . Spearcons for Patient Monitoring: Laboratory Investigation Comparing Earcons and Spearcons. Hum Factors. 2017; 59(5):765-781. DOI: 10.1177/0018720817697536. View

Titova N, Naatanen R . Preattentive voice discrimination by the human brain as indexed by the mismatch negativity. Neurosci Lett. 2001; 308(1):63-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)01970-x. View

10.

Neath I, Surprenant A, Lecompte D . Irrelevant speech eliminates the word length effect. Mem Cognit. 1998; 26(2):343-54. DOI: 10.3758/bf03201145. View

11.

Lacherez P, Donaldson L, Burt J . Do Learned Alarm Sounds Interfere With Working Memory?. Hum Factors. 2016; 58(7):1044-1051. DOI: 10.1177/0018720816662733. View

12.

Wickens C . Multiple resources and mental workload. Hum Factors. 2008; 50(3):449-55. DOI: 10.1518/001872008X288394. View

13.

Logie R, Zucco G, Baddeley A . Interference with visual short-term memory. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1990; 75(1):55-74. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90066-o. View

14.

Petocz A, Keller P, Stevens C . Auditory warnings, signal-referent relations, and natural indicators: re-thinking theory and application. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008; 14(2):165-78. DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.165. View

15.

Banbury S, Macken W, Tremblay S, Jones D . Auditory distraction and short-term memory: phenomena and practical implications. Hum Factors. 2001; 43(1):12-29. DOI: 10.1518/001872001775992462. View

16.

Ljungberg J, Parmentier F . The impact of intonation and valence on objective and subjective attention capture by auditory alarms. Hum Factors. 2012; 54(5):826-37. DOI: 10.1177/0018720812438613. View

17.

Ashburn A, Stack E, Pickering R, Ward C . A community-dwelling sample of people with Parkinson's disease: characteristics of fallers and non-fallers. Age Ageing. 2001; 30(1):47-52. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/30.1.47. View

18.

Bayliss D, Jarrold C, Gunn D, Baddeley A . The complexities of complex span: explaining individual differences in working memory in children and adults. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003; 132(1):71-92. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.71. View

19.

Kattner F, Meinhardt H . Dissociating the Disruptive Effects of Irrelevant Music and Speech on Serial Recall of Tonal and Verbal Sequences. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:346. PMC: 7066211. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00346. View

20.

NITTONO H . Background instrumental music and serial recall. Percept Mot Skills. 1997; 84(3 Pt 2):1307-13. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1997.84.3c.1307. View