» Articles » PMID: 35282142

Optimal and Actual Rates of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) Utilisation for Primary Lung Cancer in Australia

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Mar 14
PMID 35282142
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Radiotherapy utilisation rates considerably vary across different countries and service providers, highlighting the need to establish reliable benchmarks against which utilisation rates can be assessed. Here, optimal utilisation rates of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) for lung cancer are estimated and compared against actual utilisation rates to identify potential shortfalls in service provision.

Materials And Methods: An evidence-based optimal utilisation model was constructed after reviewing practice guidelines and identifying indications for lung SABR based on the best available evidence. The proportions of patients likely to develop each indication were obtained, whenever possible, from Australian population-based studies. Sensitivity analysis was performed to account for variations in epidemiological data. Practice pattern studies were reviewed to obtain actual utilisation rates.

Results: A total of 6% of all lung cancer patients were estimated to optimally require SABR at least once during the course of their illness (95% CI: 4-6%). Optimal utilisation rates were estimated to be 32% for stage I and 10% for stage II NSCLC. Actual utilisation rates for stage I NSCLC varied between 6 and 20%. For patients with inoperable stage I, 27-74% received SABR compared to the estimated optimal rate of 82%.

Conclusion: The estimated optimal SABR utilisation rates for lung cancer can serve as useful benchmarks to highlight gaps in service delivery and help plan for more adequate and efficient provision of care. The model can be easily modified to determine optimal utilisation rates in other populations or updated to reflect any changes in practice guidelines or epidemiological data.

Citing Articles

Utilisation of radiotherapy in lung cancer: A scoping narrative literature review with a focus on the introduction of evidence-based therapeutic approaches in Europe.

Corral J, Borras J, Lievens Y Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024; 45:100717.

PMID: 38226026 PMC: 10788411. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100717.

References
1.
Vinod S, OConnell D, Simonella L, Delaney G, Boyer M, Peters M . Gaps in optimal care for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2008; 3(8):871-9. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31818020c3. View

2.
Koshy M, Malik R, Mahmood U, Husain Z, Sher D . Stereotactic body radiotherapy and treatment at a high volume facility is associated with improved survival in patients with inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2015; 114(2):148-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.12.004. View

3.
Postmus P, Kerr K, Oudkerk M, Senan S, Waller D, Vansteenkiste J . Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017; 28(suppl_4):iv1-iv21. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx222. View

4.
Walters S, Maringe C, Coleman M, Peake M, Butler J, Young N . Lung cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK: a population-based study, 2004-2007. Thorax. 2013; 68(6):551-64. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202297. View

5.
Zelman Lewis S, Diekemper R, Addrizzo-Harris D . Methodology for development of guidelines for lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013; 143(5 Suppl):41S-50S. DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-2344. View