» Articles » PMID: 35278534

Concordance in RT-PCR Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Between Samples Preserved in Viral and Bacterial Transport Medium

Overview
Journal J Virol Methods
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 Mar 12
PMID 35278534
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: While the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in samples preserved in viral transport medium (VTM) by RT-PCR is a standard diagnostic method, this may preclude the study of bacterial respiratory pathogens from the same specimen. It is unclear if the use of skim milk, tryptone, glucose, and glycerin (STGG) transport media, used for study of respiratory bacteria, allows an efficient and concurrent study of SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Objectives: To determine the concordance in SARS-CoV-2 detection by real time RT-PCR between paired nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs preserved in STGG and nasal (NS) swabs preserved in VTM.

Study Design: Paired samples of NP and NS swabs were collected between December 2020 and March 2021 from a prospective longitudinal cohort study of 44 households and 132 participants from a peri-urban community (Lima, Peru). NP and NS swabs were taken from all participants once and twice per week, respectively, independent of respiratory symptoms. STGG medium was used for NP samples and VTM for NS samples. Samples were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR for N, S and ORF1ab targets. We calculated the concordance in detections between sample types and compared the RT-PCR cycle thresholds (Ct).

Results: Among the 148 paired samples, we observed a high concordance in detections between NP and NS samples (agreement = 94.59%; Kappa = 0.79). Median Ct values were statistically similar between sample types for each RT-PCR target: N, S and ORF1ab (p = 0.11, p = 0.71 and p = 0.11, respectively).

Conclusions: NP swabs collected in STGG medium are reliable alternatives to nasal swabs collected in VTM for the study of SARS-CoV-2.

References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Gupta R, George R, Nguyen-Van-Tam J . Bacterial pneumonia and pandemic influenza planning. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008; 14(8):1187-92. PMC: 2600366. DOI: 10.3201/eid1408.070751. View

3.
OBrien K, Bronsdon M, Dagan R, Yagupsky P, JANCO J, Elliott J . Evaluation of a medium (STGG) for transport and optimal recovery of Streptococcus pneumoniae from nasopharyngeal secretions collected during field studies. J Clin Microbiol. 2001; 39(3):1021-4. PMC: 87867. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.1021-1024.2001. View

4.
Satzke C, Turner P, Virolainen-Julkunen A, Adrian P, Antonio M, Hare K . Standard method for detecting upper respiratory carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae: updated recommendations from the World Health Organization Pneumococcal Carriage Working Group. Vaccine. 2013; 32(1):165-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.062. View

5.
Lanata C, Gil A, Ecker L, Cornejo R, Rios S, Ochoa M . SARS-CoV-2 infections in households in a peri-urban community of Lima, Peru: A prospective cohort study. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2021; 16(3):386-394. PMC: 8983893. DOI: 10.1111/irv.12952. View